ArticleNorthern clinics of Istanbul2020
Seeking predictors for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in stroke with an online clinical database.
Article in Northern clinics of Istanbul, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Predictive value of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio for ischemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation: A meta-analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Pooled it
- Development and Validation of a Novel Score for Predicting Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation in Acute Ischemic Stroke.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveA considerable fraction of ischemic stroke cases remain cryptogenic and there is increasing data suggesting the role of missed paroxysmal atrial fibrillations (pAF) in at least a number of these cases. Since electrophysiological identification of pAFs can be challenging, there has been an accumulation of proposed predictors and biomarkers for pAFs. The predictive values of these is varying and sometimes conflicting among studies. Therefore, we aimed to verify a fraction of previously reported parameters for pAF detection by investigating an independent clinical sample.
methodsUsing a publicly available data downloaded from the MIMIC-3 intensive care unit database, we tested the predictive role of particular risk factors and biomarkers for pAF detection after ischemic stroke in 124 patients with ischemic stroke admitted within 24 hours of stroke onset.
resultsOur evaluation revealed a strong association of older age in women, as well as admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and discharge modified Rankin Scores (mRS) in both sexes for pAFs, in patients that were in sinus rhythm on admission. We also detected a trend for lower gender-adjusted hemoglobin in patients with pAF, although the difference was insignificant. On the other hand, we did not find any significant association of pAF detection with some other previously reported biomarkers: serum magnesium level, leukocyte count, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio or left atrial dilatation.
conclusionEven though our analysis did not reveal a strong and specific biomarker to predict pAFs after stroke, it identified key risk factors. It may be necessary to consider the possibility of pAFs and perform rigorous evaluation to prevent further events of embolic stroke in female patients older than 75 years, with more severe neurological deficits on admission, higher disability on discharge and also with relatively lower hemoglobin level. This first study from Turkey using clinical data from the MIMIC-3 database also demonstrates the value of publicized clinical data for confirmatory studies on various medical fields across the World.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.