ArticleIISE transactions2020
Access Planning and Resource Coordination for Clinical Research Operations.
Article in IISE transactions, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Estimating the workload of a multi-disciplinary care team using patient-level encounter histories.Health systems (Basingstoke, England) · 2024Article
- Resource management and capacity planning for clinical trial sites.Journal of clinical and translational research · 2024Article
- Review
- Harnessing digital health technologies and real-world evidence to enhance clinical research and patient outcomes.Digital healthReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This research creates an operations engineering and management methodology to optimize a complex operational planning and coordination challenge faced by sites that perform clinical research trials. The time-sensitive and resource-specific treatment sequences for each of the many trial protocols conducted at a site make it very difficult to capture the dynamics of this unusually complex system. Existing approaches for site planning and participant scheduling exhibit both excessively long and highly variable Time to First Available Visit (TFAV) waiting times and high staff overtime costs. We have created a new method, termed CApacity Planning Tool And INformatics (CAPTAIN) that provides decision support to identify the most valuable set of research trials to conduct within available resources and a plan for how to book their participants. Constraints include (i) the staff overtime costs, and/or (ii) the TFAV by trial. To estimate the site's metrics via a Mixed Integer Program, CAPTAIN combines a participant trajectory forecasting with an efficient visit booking reservation plan to allocate the date for the first visit of every participant's treatment sequence. It also plans a daily nursing staff schedule that is optimized together with the booking reservation plan to optimize each nurse's shift assignments in consideration of participants' requirements/needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.