ArticleAdvanced materials technologies2019
Stereolithographic 3D Printing for Deterministic Control over Integration in Dual-Material Composites.
Article in Advanced materials technologies, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Vat Photopolymerization-Fabricated Theranostic Hydrogels for Smart Wound Management.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The Mechanics of Bioinspired Stiff-to-Compliant Multi-Material 3D-Printed Interfaces.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- A Review of Multi-Material 3D Printing of Functional Materials via Vat Photopolymerization.Polymers · 2022Review
- Hybprinting for musculoskeletal tissue engineering.iScience · 2022Review
- Hydrolytically degradable Poly (β-amino ester) resins with tunable degradation for 3D printing by projection micro-stereolithography.Advanced functional materials · 2022Article
- 3D printing of sacrificial thioester elastomers using digital light processing for templating 3D organoid structures in soft biomatrices.Biofabrication · 2021Article
- Microscale Photopatterning of Through-thickness Modulus in a Monolithic and Functionally Graded 3D Printed Part.Small science · 2021Article
- Cell encapsulation spatially alters crosslink density of poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels formed from free-radical polymerizations.Acta biomaterialia · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This work introduces a rapid and facile approach to predictably control integration between two materials with divergent properties. Programmed integration between photopolymerizable soft and stiff hydrogels was investigated for their promise in applications such as tissue engineering where heterogeneous properties are often desired. Spatial control afforded by grayscale 3D printing was leveraged to define regions at the interface that permit diffusive transport of a second material in-filled into the 3D printed part. The printing parameters (i.e., effective exposure dose) for the resin were correlated directly to mesh size to achieve controlled diffusion. Applying this information to grayscale exposures led to a range of distances over which integration was achieved with high fidelity. A prescribed finite distance of integration between soft and stiff hydrogels led to a 33% increase in strain to failure under tensile testing and eliminated failure at the interface. The feasibility of this approach was demonstrated in a layer-by-layer 3D printed part fabricated by stereolithography, which was subsequently infilled with a soft hydrogel containing osteoblastic cells. In summary, this approach holds promise for applications where integration of multiple materials and living cells is needed by allowing precise control over integration and reducing mechanical failure at contrasting material interfaces.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.