ArticleJournal of health economics and outcomes research2020
Treatment Patterns and Health Care Costs in Commercially Insured Patients with Follicular Lymphoma.
Article in Journal of health economics and outcomes research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Systematic Literature Review of the Economic and Healthcare Resource Utilization Burden of Relapsed/Refractory Follicular Lymphoma.PharmacoEconomics - open · 2025Pooled it
- Phase 3 SELENE study: ibrutinib plus BR/R-CHOP in previously treated patients with follicular or marginal zone lymphoma.Blood advances · 2023Trial
- Safety and antitumor activity of copanlisib in Japanese patients with relapsed/refractory indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a phase Ib/II study.International journal of hematology · 2023Trial
- Real-World Treatment Patterns, Healthcare Resource Use, and Costs in Patients with Follicular Lymphoma, Waldenström Macroglobulinemia, and Marginal Zone Lymphoma: A Claims-Based Study in the USA.Clinical drug investigation · 2026Article
- Real-world outcomes after CAR T versus standard therapy in third-line or later relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma in the United States.Future oncology (London, England) · 2026Article
- Optimal number of cycles of bendamustine as initial chemoimmunotherapy for older patients with follicular lymphoma.Blood neoplasia · 2024Article
- Burden of Illness in Follicular Lymphoma with Multiple Lines of Treatment, Italian RWE Analysis.Cancers · 2023Article
- Estimating the Burden of Illness of Relapsed Follicular Lymphoma and Marginal Zone Lymphoma in Ontario, Canada.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023Article
- Yttrium-90 Ibritumomab Tiuxetan is Cost-Effective Compared to Bendamustine + Rituximab in Low-grade Lymphomas.Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia · 2023Article
- Cost-effectiveness of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in adults with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma.Blood advances · 2023Article
- Treatment patterns and outcomes in relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma: results from the international SCHOLAR-5 study.Haematologica · 2023Article
- Physician-Reported Perspectives on Myasthenia Gravis in the United States: A Real-World Survey.Neurology and therapy · 2022Article
- Treatment Patterns of Follicular Lymphoma in the United States: A Claims Analysis.Journal of health economics and outcomes research · 2022Article
- Budgetary Impact of Bendamustine Ready-to-Dilute Products in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia and Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma to a United States Infusion Facility.ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFew studies have estimated the real-world economic burden such as all-cause and follicular lymphoma (FL)-related costs and health care resource utilization (HCRU) in patients with FL.
objectivesThis study evaluated outcomes in patients who were newly initiated with FL indicated regimens by line of therapy with real-world data.
methodsA retrospective study was conducted among patients with FL from MarketScan
resultsThis study identified 598 patients who initiated FL indicated treatment. The average follow-up time was approximately 5.7 years. Of these patients, 50.2% (n=300) were female, with a mean age of 60.7 years (SD=13.1 years) when initiating their treatment with FL indicated regimens. Overall, 598 (100%) patients received first-line therapy, 180 (43.6%) received second-line therapy, 51 received third-line therapy, 21 received fourth-line therapy, and 10 received fifth-line therapy. Duration of treatment by each line of therapy was 370 days, 392 days, 162 days, 148 days, and 88 days, respectively. The most common first-line regimens received by patients were rituximab (n=201, 33.6%), R-CHOP (combination of rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin hydrochloride [hydroxydaunomycin]; n=143, 24.0%), BR (combination of bendamustine and rituximab; n=143, 24.0%), and R-CVP (combination of rituximab, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone; n=71, 11.9%). The most common second-line treatment regimens were (N=180): rituximab (n=78, 43.3%) and BR (n=41, 22.8%). Annualized all-cause health care costs per patient ranged from US$97 141 (SD: US$144 730) for first-line to US$424 758 (SD: US$715 028) for fifth-line therapy.
conclusionsThe primary regimens used across treatment lines conform to those recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network clinical practice guidelines. The economic burden for patients with FL is high and grows with subsequent lines of therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.