The Impact of Glass Material on Growth and Biocatalytic Performance of Mixed-Species Biofilms in Capillary Reactors for Continuous Cyclohexanol Production.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Discovering a green pesticide candidate for controlling bacterial plant disease: 1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-β-carboline as a potential biofilm inhibitor.RSC advances · 2025
   Article
2. Evaluating scaling of capillary photo-biofilm reactors for high cell density cultivation of mixed trophies artificial microbial consortia.Engineering in life sciences · 2023
   Article
3. Spatial organization and proteome of a dual-species cyanobacterial biofilm alter among NmSystems · 2023
   Article
4. Evaluation of self-sustaining cyanobacterial biofilms for technical applications.Biofilm · 2022
   Article
5. The survivor strain: isolation and characterization ofFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

Indexed as