Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33042982›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2020

Recent Advances of Chitosan-Based Injectable Hydrogels for Bone and Dental Tissue Regeneration.

Guoke Tang, Zhihong Tan, Wusi Zeng, Xing Wang, Changgui Shi, Yi Liu, Hailong He, Rui Chen, Xiaojian Ye

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 160 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Guoke TangDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Zhihong TanDepartment of Spine Surgery, The Affiliated Zhuzhou Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University (CSU), Hunan, China.
Wusi ZengDepartment of Spine Surgery, The Affiliated Zhuzhou Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University (CSU), Hunan, China.
Xing WangBeijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences, Institute of Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Changgui ShiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Yi LiuDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Hailong HeDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Rui ChenDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Xiaojian YeDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Second Military Medical University · CNCentral South University · CNChinese Academy of Sciences · CNShanghai Jiao Tong University · CNTongren Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional strategies of bone repair include autografts, allografts and surgical reconstructions, but they may bring about potential hazard of donor site morbidity, rejection, risk of disease transmission and repetitive surgery. Bone tissue engineering (BTE) is a multidisciplinary field that offers promising substitutes in biopharmaceutical applications, and chitosan (CS)-based bone reconstructions can be a potential candidate in regenerative tissue fields owing to its low immunogenicity, biodegradability, bioresorbable features, low-cost and economic nature. Formulations of CS-based injectable hydrogels with thermo/pH-response are advantageous in terms of their high-water imbibing capability, minimal invasiveness, porous networks, and ability to mold perfectly into an irregular defect. Additionally, CS combined with other naturally-derived or synthetic polymers and bioactive agents has proven to be an effective alternative to autologous bone and dental grafts. In this review, we will highlight the current progress in the development of preparation methods, physicochemical properties and applications of CS-based injectable hydrogels and their perspectives in bone and dental regeneration. We believe this review is intended as starting point and inspiration for future research effort to develop the next generation of tissue-engineering scaffold materials.

Indexed as

bone repairchitosandental tissue regenerationinjectable hydrogelresponsiveness

Identifiers

PMID33042982
PMCPMC7527831
OpenAlexW3087998107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.