Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33042902›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2020

Neonatal Sepsis Diagnosis Decision-Making Based on Artificial Neural Networks.

Addy Cecilia Helguera-Repetto, María Dolores Soto-Ramírez, Oscar Villavicencio-Carrisoza, Samantha Yong-Mendoza, Angélica Yong-Mendoza, Moisés León-Juárez, Jorge A González-Y-Merchand, Verónica Zaga-Clavellina, Claudine Irles

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Addy Cecilia Helguera-RepettoDepartment of Immunobiochemistry, Instituto Nacional de Perinatología, Mexico City, Mexico.
María Dolores Soto-RamírezDepartment of Immunobiochemistry, Instituto Nacional de Perinatología, Mexico City, Mexico.
Oscar Villavicencio-CarrisozaDepartment of Immunobiochemistry, Instituto Nacional de Perinatología, Mexico City, Mexico.
Samantha Yong-MendozaDepartment of Immunobiochemistry, Instituto Nacional de Perinatología, Mexico City, Mexico.
Angélica Yong-MendozaDepartment of Immunobiochemistry, Instituto Nacional de Perinatología, Mexico City, Mexico.
Moisés León-JuárezDepartment of Immunobiochemistry, Instituto Nacional de Perinatología, Mexico City, Mexico.
Jorge A González-Y-MerchandDepartment of Microbiology, Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Mexico City, Mexico.
Verónica Zaga-ClavellinaDepartment of Physiology and Cellular Development, Instituto Nacional de Perinatología, Mexico City, Mexico.
Claudine IrlesDepartment of Physiology and Cellular Development, Instituto Nacional de Perinatología, Mexico City, Mexico.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neonatal sepsis remains difficult to diagnose due to its non-specific signs and symptoms. Traditional scoring systems help to discriminate between septic or not patients, but they do not consider every single patient particularity. Thus, the purpose of this study was to develop an early- and late-onset neonatal sepsis diagnosis model, based on clinical maternal and neonatal data from electronic records, at the time of clinical suspicion. A predictive model was obtained by training and validating an artificial Neural Networks (ANN) algorithm with a balanced dataset consisting of preterm and term non-septic or septic neonates (early- and late-onset), with negative and positive culture results, respectively, using 25 maternal and neonatal features. The outcome of the model was sepsis or not. The performance measures of the model, evaluated with an independent dataset, outperformed physician's diagnosis using the same features based on traditional scoring systems, with a 93.3% sensitivity, an 80.0% specificity, a 94.4% AUROC, and a regression coefficient of 0.974 between actual and simulated results. The model also performed well-relative to the state-of-the-art methods using similar maternal/neonatal variables. The top 10 factors estimating sepsis were maternal age, cervicovaginitis and neonatal: fever, apneas, platelet counts, gender, bradypnea, band cells, catheter use, and birth weight.

Indexed as

machine learningneural networknewbornprematuritysepsis

Identifiers

PMID33042902
PMCPMC7518045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.