ArticleJournal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry
Bond Strength to Microtraction and Nanofiltration Using Ethanol Wet Bonding Technique in Fresh Extracted Teeth: An
Article in Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of Different Light-curing Modes on the Compressive Strengths of Nanohybrid Resin-based Composites: A ComparativeJournal of International Society of Preventive & Community DentistryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe objective of this study was to evaluate the bond strength to microtraction and nanofiltration using ethanol wet bonding technique in fresh extracted teeth. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis quasi-experimental
resultsThe ethanol technique without premature failure (PF) group had an average of 31.26 ± 10.26MPa, whereas the lowest value was found in the water technique group with PF, which had 22.59 ± 12.27MPa. When performing inferential statistics, it was evidenced that there were statistically significant differences between both techniques with a value of
conclusionAccording to the results in both cases, the adhesive strength showed superiority in the ethanol wash group. It determines that this technique presents greater tolerance to the residual presence of water. Finally, in relation to nanofiltration we found that there were no significant differences between the groups evaluated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.