ArticleFrontiers in oncology2020
Circulating Tumor DNA as a Prognostic Biomarker in Localized Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
61 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 111 citations in OpenAlex.
- The prognostic role of circulating DNA markers in patients with lung malignancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Biomarkers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Circulating tumour DNA-Based molecular residual disease detection in resectable cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.EBioMedicine · 2024Pooled it
- Prognostic value of preoperative circulating tumor DNA in non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2024Pooled it
- Prognostic value of circulating tumor DNA in operable non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and reconstructed individual patient-data based meta-analysis.BMC medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Clinical significance of circulating tumor DNA in localized non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Utility of ctDNA in predicting relapse in solid tumors after curative therapy: a meta-analysis.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2023Pooled it
- Accuracy of minimal residual disease detection by circulating tumor DNA profiling in lung cancer: a meta-analysis.BMC medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Potential clinical utility of liquid biopsy in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer.BMC medicine · 2022Pooled it
- [Research Progress on Circulating Tumor DNA Status and Postoperative Central Nervous System Recurrence Risk and Overall Survival in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2026Review
- The evolving role of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in resectable non-small cell lung cancer: a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- Risk-adaptive management of stage III NSCLC in the perioperative immunotherapy era: a critical synthesis and clinical framework.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Advances in neoadjuvant immunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Circulating tumor DNA as prognostic markers of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a systematic review and meta-analysis.Translational lung cancer research · 2025Article
- Comprehensive Liquid Biopsy Approaches for the Clinical Management of Lung Cancer Using Multiple Biological Matrices.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Review
- Circulating tumor DNA in lung cancer: a bibliometric analysis of studies published from 2001 to 2024.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a methylation-specific droplet digital PCR multiplex for lung cancer detection.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- A comprehensive overview of minimal residual disease in the management of early-stage and locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Article
- Revolution of Circulating Tumor DNA: From Bench Innovations to Bedside Implementations.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Review
1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRoutine clinical surveillance involves serial radiographic imaging following radical surgery in localized non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, such surveillance can detect only macroscopic disease recurrence and is frequently inconclusive. We investigated if detection of ctDNA before and after resection of NSCLC identifies the patients with risk of relapse, and furthermore, informs about response to management.
methodsWe recruited a total of 77 NSCLC patients. A high-throughput 127 target-gene capture technology and a high-sensitivity circulating single-molecule amplification and resequencing technology (cSMART) assay were used to detect the somatic mutations in the tumor tissues as well as the plasma of NSCLC patients before and after surgery to monitor for minimal residual disease (MRD). Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis were performed to evaluate the relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients with predictor variables.
resultsPatients with a higher stage (III/IV) and preoperative ctDNA-positive status demonstrated a significant 2.8-3.4-fold risk and 3.8-4.0-fold risk for recurrence and death, respectively. Preoperative ctDNA-positive patients associated with a lower RFS (HR = 3.812,
conclusionAdvanced stage and preoperative ctDNA-positive are strong predictors of RFS and OS in localized NSCLC patients undergoing complete resection. Postoperative detection of ctDNA increases chance to detect early relapse, thus can fulfill an important role in stratifying patients for immediate further treatment with adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.