Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33042799›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2020

A Meta-Analysis of Glasgow Prognostic Score and Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score as Biomarkers for Predicting Survival Outcome in Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Tongyu Tong, Yupeng Guan, Haiyun Xiong, Liling Wang, Jun Pang

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tongyu TongDepartment of Urology, Nephrology and Urology Center, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China.
Yupeng GuanDepartment of Urology, Nephrology and Urology Center, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China.
Haiyun XiongDepartment of Urology, Nephrology and Urology Center, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China.
Liling WangMaternal and Child Health Research Institute, Baoan Maternity & Child Healthcare Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Jun PangDepartment of Urology, Nephrology and Urology Center, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

biomarkersGlasgow prognostic scoremeta-analysismodified Glasgow prognostic scorerenal cell carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID33042799
PMCPMC7527435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.