ArticleCureus2020
Rheumatoid Arthritis Does Not Negatively Impact Outcomes of Patients Admitted for Atrial Fibrillation.
Article in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association between rheumatoid arthritis and atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of arrhythmia · 2024Review
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Reasons for Hospitalization of Psoriasis Patients: A Report From the National Inpatient Sample.Cureus · 2020Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives This study aimed to compare the outcomes of patients primarily admitted for atrial fibrillation (AF) with and without a secondary diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The primary outcome of interest was inpatient mortality. Hospital length of stay (LOS), total hospital charges, and odds of undergoing ablation and pharmacologic cardioversion were the secondary outcomes of interest. Methods Data were abstracted from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) 2016 and 2017 databases. The NIS is the largest hospitalization database in the United States (US). The NIS was searched for hospitalizations for adult patients with AF as principal diagnosis with and without RA as secondary diagnosis using the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10) codes. Multivariate logistic and linear regression analysis was used accordingly to adjust for confounders. Results There were over 71 million discharges in the combined 2016 and 2017 NIS database. Out of 821,630 AF hospitalizations, 17,020 (2.1%) had RA. Hospitalizations for AF with RA had 0.18 days' decrease in adjusted mean LOS (p=0.014), and lower total hospital charges ($38,432 vs $39,175, p=0.018) compared to those without RA. AF hospitalizations with RA had similar inpatient mortality [1.1% vs 0.91%, adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 0.90, 95% CI: 0.63-1.27, p=0.540] and odds of undergoing ablation (3.5% vs 4.2%, AOR: 1.1, 95% CI: 0.87-1.30, p=0.549) and pharmacologic cardioversion (0.38% vs 0.38%, AOR: 1.00, 95% CI: 0.53-1.89, p=0.988) compared to those without RA. Conclusions Patients admitted for AF with coexisting RA were found to have lesser adjusted mean LOS and lower total hospital charges compared to those without RA. However, inpatient mortality and the odds of undergoing ablation and pharmacologic cardioversion were similar between both groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.