Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33042671›Full record

ArticleCureus2020

Antibiotic Susceptibility Patterns of Salmonella Typhi and Salmonella Paratyphi in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Islamabad.

Masab Umair, Shajee Ahmad Siddiqui

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Prevalence of the Antibiotic Resistance ofOpen forum infectious diseases · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Antimicrobial Resistance Patterns and Prevalence ofInterdisciplinary perspectives on infectious diseases · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. High Resistance ofTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2021
    Article
  13. Turkish journal of emergency medicine
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Masab UmairGeneral (Internal) Medicine, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences, Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Medical University, Islamabad, PAK.
Shajee Ahmad SiddiquiGeneral (Internal) Medicine, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences, Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Medical University, Islamabad, PAK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Enteric fever is a serious public health problem in Pakistan. Growing problem of drug-resistant Salmonella strains and outbreak of ceftriaxone-resistant Salmonella typhi in Hyderabad during 2016-2017 is concerning. This study aimed to determine the antibiogram profile of Salmonella typhi and Salmonella paratyphi isolated from blood cultures of patients presenting in Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences (PIMS), Islamabad. Materials and methods A retrospective cross-sectional study conducted in PIMS. A case of enteric fever was defined as a patient with blood culture positive for either S. typhi or S. paratyphi. Demographics and antibiogram profile of the 664 cases who presented during 2012-2018 were included in this study. Results Out of 664 cases, S. typhi was isolated from 528 and S. paratyphi was isolated from 136 cases. Males accounted for the majority of the cases (n = 440, 66.3%). Clustering of the cases was observed in young adults (18-25 years). Incidence was highest during months of summer and monsoon (May-September). Most of the S. typhi isolates were resistant to the first-line antibiotics (amoxicillin 57.6%, co-trimoxazole 61.4%, chloramphenicol 46.9%) and ciprofloxacin (62.7%). Antibiotic resistance rates were lowest for imipenem (3.8%) and ceftriaxone (4.4%). Among S. typhi isolates tested for all first-line antibiotics, 44.6% (149/334) were multidrug-resistant (MDR). In contrast, only 12.2% (11/90) of the S. paratyphi isolates were MDR. 0.7% (2/283) of the tested S. typhi isolates were extensively drug-resistant (XDR). XDR strains were sensitive to imipenem. There was an overall reduction in first-line antibiotic resistance rates from 2012 to 2018. Conclusion S. typhi accounted for the majority of the cases of enteric fever. Most S. typhi isolates were resistant to first-line antibiotics. S. paratyphi exhibited lower antibiotic resistance rates. This study recommends third-generation cephalosporins for empirical therapy and for treatment of MDR cases of enteric fever. Imipenem should be reserved for the treatment of XDR Salmonella cases. A decreasing trend in first-line antibiotic resistance rates over time is promising. Antibiotic stewardship is the need of the hour.

Indexed as

enteric feverextensively drug resistantmdrmulti drug resistantparatyphoidsalmonellatyphoidxdr

Identifiers

PMID33042671
PMCPMC7535864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.