ArticleCureus2020
Clinico-Radiological Evaluation of Modified Stoppa Approach in Treatment of Acetabulum Fractures.
Article in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Developing a core outcome set for acetabular fractures: a systematic review (part I).Systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- The relation between surgical approaches for pelvic ring and acetabular fractures and postoperative complications: a systematic review.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2023Pooled it
- Modified Stoppa Approach Alone or in Combination with a Lateral Window for Acetabular Fractures Involving Both Columns.Hip & pelvis · 2025Article
- Sexual and Urinary Dysfunction Following Isolated Acetabulum Fractures: A Systematic Review of the Literature.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- The intrapelvic approach to the acetabulum.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2024Review
- Acetabular fractures treatment needs in the elderly and nonagenarians.EFORT open reviews · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of Modified Stoppa approach for surgical treatment of acetabulum fractures by analyzing clinical and radiological outcomes. Also, we assess intraoperative and postoperative complications of fracture treated by using Modified Stoppa approach. Objectives To evaluate clinical outcomes of Modified Stoppa approach by using Merle d'Aubigne hip score. To evaluate the radiological reduction quality of Modified Stoppa approach by using the criteria of Matta, and to assess complications of Modified Stoppa approach. Method Thirty-two patients participated in this study (mean age 40 years; range 18-60 years) and the male to female ratio was 4:1, patients who underwent surgical intervention for acetabular fracture by using Modified Stoppa approach from Oct 2017 to April 2019 were included. Out of 32 patients, two were lost in follow up, leaving 30 of 32 patients for clinico-radiological analysis. We classified the fracture pattern according to Judet and Letournel classification based on preoperative X-ray AP view, Judet View, and 3D-CT pelvis. Operative time, blood loss, reduction quality, and perioperative complications were assessed in each patient. Clinical outcomes were assessed by Merle d'Aubigne hip score and radiological outcomes by criteria of Matta. Results Out of 30 acetabulum fractures in 30 patients, three (10%) were categorized as anterior column fracture, one (3.3%) as transverse with posterior wall, one (3.33%) as T-type, six (20%) as anterior column with posterior hemi-transverse and 19 (63.33%) as both column fractures. In our study, most patients have trauma due to road traffic accident (RTA) in 25 (83.3%) and fall from stairs in three (10%) patients. Timing of surgery after trauma was average 5.83 days (range three to 15 days), Mean surgical time determined to be 214.66 min (range 150-350 min) and mean intraoperative loss 683.33 ml (range 230-1250 ml). Clinical outcomes by Merle d'Aubigne hip score was excellent in 13 (43.33%), good in 15 (50%), fair in two (6.66%) patients whereas poor results in 0 (0%) patient (p=0.001). Quality of reduction by Matta criteria was found to be an anatomical reduction in 26 (86.6%), imperfect reduction in three (10%), and poor reduction in one patient (3.33%) (p<0.001). Radiological grading by Matta criteria was excellent in 24 (80%), good in five (16.66%), and fair in one (3.33%) patient, and no patients met criteria for poor results (p<0.001). In operative complications one patient developed an external iliac vein injury which was repaired by a vascular surgeon, one patient had a superficial infection for which debridement, regular dressing, and IV antibiotics given and resolve in one month, obturator nerve injury in one patient which was resolve in five to six months, lateral femoral cutaneous nerve injury in one patient which resolved within three months and one patient urinary bladder injury which was repaired by a general surgeon. Conclusion Our experience with Modified Stoppa approach for surgical treatment of acetabulum fracture in 30 patients is excellent and effective for better visualization to anterior column, quadrilateral plate, and up to sacroiliac joint. This approach provides better visibility of the fracture site which allows for good to an excellent reduction of fracture and fixation. Although Stoppa approach is cosmetic surgery in terms of scar size, there is less complication rate than the ilioinguinal approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.