ArticleNPJ Regenerative medicine2020
Progressing the field of Regenerative Rehabilitation through novel interdisciplinary interaction.
Article in NPJ Regenerative medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neurorehabilitation and white matter repair in traumatic spinal cord injury: a dialogue between clinical and preclinical studies.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Review
- Engineering Multifunctional Nanozymes to Reprogram Oxidative Stress and Inflammation in Chronic Wounds.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025Article
- Age-associated functional healing of musculoskeletal trauma through regenerative engineering and rehabilitation.Biomaterials science · 2024Article
- Regenerative rehabilitation: a novel multidisciplinary field to maximize patient outcomes.Medical review (2021) · 2024Review
- Myths and truths on biophysics-based approach in rehabilitation of musculoskeletal disorders.Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2023Review
- Inclusivity and diversity: Integrating international perspectives on stem cell challenges and potential.Stem cell reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The synergy between biological and bioengineering advances is critical to developing novel and impactful translational therapies. However, there currently are few opportunities for regenerative scientists to be exposed to the methodologies commonly employed in the clinic by rehabilitation professionals, and most rehabilitation scientists and clinicians are not exposed to the many advances of regenerative medicine. This disconnect has impeded the pace of progress in the field. The Eighth Annual International Symposium on Regenerative Rehabilitation brought together basic scientists, engineers, and rehabilitation clinicians to present scientifically rigorous and cutting-edge research and clinical management, focusing on new and innovative approaches that combine discoveries in tissue engineering, medical devices, and cellular therapies with rehabilitative protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.