Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33042570›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2020

Feasibility study on the adoption of the WHO safe childbirth checklist by front-line healthcare providers and managers in Burkina Faso and Côte d'Ivoire.

Kadidiatou Raissa Kourouma, Wambi Maurice Evariste Yaméogo, Daouda Doukouré, Marie Laurette Agbré Yacé, Akoua Tano Kamelan, Soltié Aminata Coulibaly-Koné, Tiéba Millogo, Séni Kouanda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kadidiatou Raissa KouroumaInstitut National de Santé Publique/Cellule de Recherche en Santé de la Reproduction, Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire.ORCID 0000-0002-7585-1438
Wambi Maurice Evariste YaméogoInstitut Africain de Santé Publique/Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Daouda DoukouréInstitut National de Santé Publique/Cellule de Recherche en Santé de la Reproduction, Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire.
Marie Laurette Agbré YacéInstitut National de Santé Publique/Cellule de Recherche en Santé de la Reproduction, Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire.
Akoua Tano KamelanInstitut National de Santé Publique/Cellule de Recherche en Santé de la Reproduction, Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire.
Soltié Aminata Coulibaly-KonéInstitut National de Santé Publique/Cellule de Recherche en Santé de la Reproduction, Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire.
Tiéba MillogoInstitut Africain de Santé Publique/Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Séni KouandaInstitut Africain de Santé Publique/Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe World Health Organization Safe Childbirth Checklist tool was specifically designed for developing countries such as sub-Saharan African countries, to ensure safety and security of the couple mother and newborn around the time of childbirth. However, the implementation of the Safe Childbirth Checklist tool requires a good knowledge of the context setting to face challenges. Our study objectives were (1) to assess the acceptability of the WHO SCC tool and (2) to identify conditions and strategies for a better introduction and use of the WHO SSC tool.

methodsThis was a pilot multi-country study conducted from January to March 2019 in Burkina Faso and Côte d'Ivoire, respectively, in the health regions of central-North and Agnéby-Tiassa-Mé. In each health region, 5 health facilities of different levels within the health system pyramid were selected through a purposive sampling. The study was conducted in 2 phases: 38 healthcare providers and 15 managers were first trained to use the Safe Childbirth Checklist tool; secondly, the trained providers were allowed to use the tool in real-life conditions for 2 weeks. Then, semi-structured interviews were conducted among healthcare providers and managers. The topics covered by the interview guides were acceptability of the tool, barriers and facilitators to its use, as well as strategies for better introduction and use within the healthcare system. Analysis was carried out using the Nvivo 12 software.

resultsRespondents reported an overall good acceptance of using the tool. However, they suggested minor content adaptation. The design of the tool and increased workload were the main barriers to its use. Potential facilitators to its introduction were managers' commitment, healthcare providers' motivation, and the availability of supplies. The best strategies for optimal use were its attachment to existing tool such as partograph or/and its display in the maternity ward.

conclusionsThe findings showed that the implementation of the Safe Childbirth Checklist tool is acceptable in Burkina Faso and Côte d'Ivoire. These findings are important and will help to design a trial aiming at assessing the effectiveness of the tool WHO SCC tool in these two countries.

Indexed as

Burkina FasoCôte d’IvoireFeasibility studyMaternal and newborn careWHO safe childbirth checklist tool

Identifiers

PMID33042570
PMCPMC7541264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.