Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33042539›Full record

ArticleArchives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique2020

Lost in space - an exploration of help-seeking among young people with mental health problems: a constructivist grounded theory study.

Katrin Häggström Westberg, Jens M Nygren, Maria Nyholm, Ing-Marie Carlsson, Petra Svedberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Mental Health Problems among Young People-A Scoping Review of Help-Seeking.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Katrin Häggström WestbergSchool of Health and Welfare, University of Halmstad, 301 18 Halmstad, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-1324-558X
Jens M NygrenSchool of Health and Welfare, University of Halmstad, 301 18 Halmstad, Sweden.
Maria NyholmSchool of Health and Welfare, University of Halmstad, 301 18 Halmstad, Sweden.
Ing-Marie CarlssonSchool of Health and Welfare, University of Halmstad, 301 18 Halmstad, Sweden.
Petra SvedbergSchool of Health and Welfare, University of Halmstad, 301 18 Halmstad, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMental health problems among young people is a worldwide public health concern. There has been an increase in mental health problems among young people in the Nordic countries in the last 25 years, particularly in Sweden. Despite this increase, international research has repeatedly shown that young people do not access or receive support when encountering mental health problems. The purpose of this study was to explore the process of help-seeking for professional support among young people with mental health problems.

methodsThe study used qualitative constructivist Grounded Theory and open-ended interviews. Thirteen young people between 15 and 23, recruited from two local support clinics, were interviewed.

results

conclusionsThe theoretical model sheds light on how young people with mental health problems were met with fragmented support services. Society needs to provide encompassing, youth-friendly and flexible support services, so that attempts at help-seeking are not missed.

Indexed as

Grounded theoryHelp-seekingMental healthSupport servicesSwedenYoung people

Identifiers

PMID33042539
PMCPMC7542338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.