Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33042535›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2020

Distance education during the COVID-19 outbreak: A cross-sectional study among medical students in North of Jordan.

Amer Mahmoud Sindiani, Nail Obeidat, Eman Alshdaifat, Lina Elsalem, Mustafa M Alwani, Hasan Rawashdeh, Ahmad S Fares, Tamara Alalawne, Loai Issa Tawalbeh

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06001879 (Protocol Title), which is not on this map. Cited by 56 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06001879 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Protocol Title : Development, Validation, and Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Simulation in Basic Life Support Training (SBLST) on Newly Employed Nurses in Governmental Jordanian Hospitals.

TypeinterventionalSponsoryousef Shukry Mohammad Abu-WardehRan2022 to 2024Enrolled102ConditionsHealthy Nurses, Educational ActivitiesArmsSimulation in basic life support training (SBLST), standard treatment by using an AHA-BLS 2020 brochure
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Parent autonomy support and undergraduates' academic engagement in online learning: the mediate role of self-regulation.Psicologia, reflexao e critica : revista semestral do Departamento de Psicologia da UFRGS · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. [Depression and anxiety among medical students in virtual education during COVID-19 pandemic].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2023
    Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Determining attitudes toward e-learning: what are the attitudes of health professional students?Zeitschrift fur Gesundheitswissenschaften = Journal of public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Amer Mahmoud SindianiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.
Nail ObeidatDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.
Eman AlshdaifatDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Yarmouk University, Irbid, Jordan.
Lina ElsalemDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbi, Jordan.
Mustafa M AlwaniMedical Students, Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.
Hasan RawashdehDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.
Ahmad S FaresMedical Students, Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.
Tamara AlalawneMedical Students, Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.
Loai Issa TawalbehPrincess Salma, Faculty of Nursing, Al-al-Bayt University, Jordan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn the spot of the new emerging COVID-19 pandemic and its major impact worldwide on day-to-day activities many rules had to be changed in order to fight this pandemic. Lockdown started in Jordan and around the globe affecting several aspects of life including economy, education, entertainment, and government policies. Regarding education, the priority was to ensure the safety and progress of the educational process. Thus, new methods of teaching had to be applied using the online learning at Jordan University of Science and Technology (JUST), Faculty of Medicine. This study was done to assess (1) Class Experience (2) Students and Lecturers' Interaction (3) Online Learning Advantages & Disadvantages (4) Students' Preference.

methodsA cross sectional study was conducted Convenience sampling technique was used to collect the data from the participants using a survey composed of 18 questions on Google Forms platform. A link was sent to the undergraduate medical students at the Jordan University of Science & Technology via their e-learning accounts (n = 3700). The form was available from May 22nd, 2020 to May 30th, 2020 for 8 days long. Data analysis was done using SPSS V 23.

results2212 out of 3700 students responded, (55.8%) of them were in the basic years and (44.2%) of them were in the clinical years. (55.8%) of students started to take online lectures after 3 weeks. (45.7%) used the hybrid teaching method (asynchronous and synchronous), (31.4%) used live classes, and 22.8% recorded classes. Zoom was the most used platform. (48.7%) and (57%) of clinical students and basic students express their interaction as bad, while the others had good and excellent interaction. Maintaining social distance was the most advantage of online teaching, while poor technical setup and no direct contact were the most disadvantage, furthermore inability to have real clinical access was a significant problem for clinical students (p < .001). With reference to students' preferences 75% of students were not pleased with their experience and 42% of students prefer to integrate online learning with traditional learning.

conclusionMost medical students at JUST preferred the traditional face-to-face teaching method over the solo online teaching methods with recommendations to convert to a more integrated educational system. Also, a well-established infrastructure should be done in involving online teaching.

Indexed as

Covid-19JordanMedical studentsOnline learning

Identifiers

PMID33042535
PMCPMC7531436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.