Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33042422›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2020

Screening of autophagy genes as prognostic indicators for glioma patients.

Shanqiang Qu, Shuhao Liu, Weiwen Qiu, Jin Liu, Huafu Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of translational research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Cancer biology & therapy · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. An integrated analysis ofCancer innovation · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The correlation between polymorphisms in theTranslational pediatrics · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Frontiers in immunology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shanqiang QuDepartment of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University Guangzhou 510080, China.
Shuhao LiuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University Shenzhen 518107, China.
Weiwen QiuDepartment of Neurology, Lishui People's Hospital (The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University) Lishui 323000, China.
Jin LiuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Lishui People's Hospital (The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University) Lishui 323000, China.
Huafu WangDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Lishui People's Hospital (The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University) Lishui 323000, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although autophagy is reported to be involved in tumorigenesis and cancer progression, its correlation with the prognosis of glioma patients remains unclear. Thus, the aim of this study was to identify prognostic autophagy-related genes, analyze their correlation with clinicopathological features of glioma, and further construct a prognostic model for glioma patients. After 139 autophagy-related genes were obtained from the GeneCards database, their expression data in glioma patients were extracted from the Chinese Glioma Genome Atlas database. Univariate and multivariate COX regression analyses were performed to identify prognostic autophagy-related genes. Ten hub autophagy-related genes associated with prognosis were identified. The autophagy risk score (ARS) was only positively correlated with histopathology (

Indexed as

Neoplasmsnomogramssurvival

Identifiers

PMID33042422
PMCPMC7540153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.