Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33042309›Full record

ArticleProcedia computer science2020

Getting Insights from a Large Corpus of Scientific Papers on Specialisted Comprehensive Topics - the Case of COVID-19.

Bernard Dousset, Josiane Mothe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Procedia computer science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Bernard DoussetIRIT, UMR5505, CNRS & Univ. Toulouse, France.
Josiane MotheIRIT, UMR5505, CNRS & INSPEE UT2J, Univ. Toulouse, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

COVID-19 is one of the most important topics these days, specifically on search engines and news. While fake news is easily shared, scientific papers are reliable sources where information can be extracted. With about 24,000 scientific publications on COVID-19 and related research on PubMed, automatic computer-assisted analysis is required. In this paper, we develop two methodologies to get insights on specific sub-topics of interest and latest research sub-topics. These rely on natural language processing and graph-based visualizations. We run these methodologies on two cases: the virus origin and the uses of existing drugs.

Indexed as

automatic keyphrase extractionAutomatic mining of scientific publicationCOVID-19Topic analysis

Identifiers

PMID33042309
PMCPMC7531911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.