Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33042231›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical health services research : an official journal of the Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain2020

Ethical Issues in Consenting Older Adults: Academic Researchers and Community Perspectives.

Shoroq M Altawalbeh, Fadi M Alkhateeb, Omar F Attarabeen

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmaceutical health services research : an official journal of the Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Vulnerability and narrative in later life.Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Ethics and healthcare in the older adult population.Journal of medical ethics and history of medicine · 2024
    Review
  11. Ethical considerations in sarcopenia research.Journal of medical ethics and history of medicine · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Shoroq M AltawalbehDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.ORCID 0000-0001-8345-4048
Fadi M AlkhateebBen and Maytee Fisch College of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Tyler, Texas, United States.
Omar F AttarabeenSchool of Pharmacy, Marshall University, West Virginia, United States.
Jordan University of Science and Technology · JOMarshall University · USQatar University · QA

Funding

The Research Ethics Education Program in JordanR25TW010026 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI AL-DELAIMY, WAEL K · 2015 to 2025
$2.5M
FIC NIH HHS R25 TW010026
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesObtaining informed consents from older adults is surrounded by many ethical and practical challenges. The objective of this study was to evaluate ethical issues and strategies in consenting older adults in Jordan as perceived by academic researchers and older adults.

methodsAn anonymous questionnaire was distributed to academic researchers in the Jordanian health sciences colleges, and a sample of older adults. The study survey included items eliciting demographics, professional characteristics, and perceptions regarding the consenting process in older adults, consent-related skills in elderly, and strategies to improve the consenting process in older adults. The survey was then modified to assess the consent-related ethical issues and challenges as viewed by a sample of older adults after explaining the concept of the consenting process to them. KEY

findingsA total of 250 academic researchers and 233 older adults participated in the study. Both researchers and older adults reported that having to sign the written forms and the impact of age-related physical impairments were the most challenging obstacles when consenting older adults. Lack of consistency and repeating questions were the most frequently encountered obstacles by researchers in consenting older adults. Ensuring privacy (anonymity/confidentiality), dedicating more time for the consenting process, treating older adults as autonomous individuals and respecting their cultural beliefs were the most helpful strategies recommended by both academic researchers and older adults.

conclusionsObtaining informed consents from older adults is a challenging process. Researchers should be aware of the special needs and strategies to achieve realistic and ethical informed consents from older adults.

Indexed as

academic researchersconsent processEthicsJordanolder adults

Identifiers

PMID33042231
PMCPMC7546426
OpenAlexW2982424012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.