Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33042183›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2020

Integrating Conventional and Participatory Crop Improvement for Smallholder Agriculture Using the Seeds for Needs Approach: A Review.

Carlo Fadda, Dejene K Mengistu, Yosef G Kidane, Matteo Dell'Acqua, Mario Enrico Pè, Jacob Van Etten

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Genomics-driven breeding for local adaptation of durum wheat is enhanced by farmers' traditional knowledge.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  9. Navigating toward resilient and inclusive seed systems.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Review
  10. Data-driven approaches can harness crop diversity to address heterogeneous needs for breeding products.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Farmers' Participatory Plant Selection of Lablab (Frontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Carlo FaddaBiodiversity for Food and Agriculture, African Hub, Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT, Nairobi, Kenya.
Dejene K MengistuBiodiversity for Food and Agriculture, Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Yosef G KidaneBiodiversity for Food and Agriculture, Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Matteo Dell'AcquaInstitute of Life Sciences, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy.
Mario Enrico PèInstitute of Life Sciences, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy.
Jacob Van EttenDigital Inclusion, Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In response to the climate change, it is essential to provide smallholder farmers with improved field crop genotypes that may increase the resilience of their farming system. This requires a fast turnover of varieties in a system capable of injecting significant amounts of genetic diversity into productive landscapes. Crop improvement is a pivotal strategy to cope with and adapt to climate change. Modern breeding may rely on the genomics revolution to speed up the development of new varieties with adaptive potential. However, centralized breeding may not adequately address smallholder farmers' needs for more locally acclimatized varieties or groups of varieties. This, in turn, constrains adoption of new varieties that reduces the effectiveness of a resource-intensive breeding process, an issue that may be overcome with participatory, decentralized approaches. Whether high-tech centralized breeding or decentralized participatory approaches are better suited for smallholder farmers in the global South is hotly debated. Sidestepping any false dichotomies and ideological issues in these debates, this review provides a perspective on relevant advances in a breeding approach that combines the two approaches and uses genomics for trait mining from

Indexed as

a high-tech crop improvementEthiopiagenetic diversityparticipatory crop improvementSeeds for Needssmallholder farmers

Identifiers

PMID33042183
PMCPMC7522193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.