Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33042167›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2020

Modulatory Role of Reactive Oxygen Species in Root Development in Model Plant of

Xuemei Zhou, Yu Xiang, Chenglong Li, Guanghui Yu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Regulation of root growth and elongation in wheat.Frontiers in plant science · 2024
    Review
  13. A novel root hair mutant,Frontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. HPlant, cell & environment · 2023
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Phenotypic effect of growth media onPlant signaling & behavior · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xuemei ZhouHubei Provincial Key Laboratory for Protection and Application of Special Plants in Wuling Area of China, Engineering Research Centre for the Protection and Utilization of Bioresource in Ethnic Area of Southern China, College of Life Sciences, South-Central University for Nationalities, Wuhan, China.
Yu XiangHubei Provincial Key Laboratory for Protection and Application of Special Plants in Wuling Area of China, Engineering Research Centre for the Protection and Utilization of Bioresource in Ethnic Area of Southern China, College of Life Sciences, South-Central University for Nationalities, Wuhan, China.
Chenglong LiHubei Provincial Key Laboratory for Protection and Application of Special Plants in Wuling Area of China, Engineering Research Centre for the Protection and Utilization of Bioresource in Ethnic Area of Southern China, College of Life Sciences, South-Central University for Nationalities, Wuhan, China.
Guanghui YuHubei Provincial Key Laboratory for Protection and Application of Special Plants in Wuling Area of China, Engineering Research Centre for the Protection and Utilization of Bioresource in Ethnic Area of Southern China, College of Life Sciences, South-Central University for Nationalities, Wuhan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reactive oxygen species (ROS), a type of oxygen monoelectronic reduction product, have a higher chemical activity than O

Indexed as

aerenchyma formationArabidopsis thalianacell cyclereactive oxygen speciesroot-hair developmentroot-stem-cell maintenance and differentiation

Identifiers

PMID33042167
PMCPMC7525048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.