Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33041978›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neurology2020

Indications, Techniques, and Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Insular Stereo-Electro-Encephalography: A Review.

Amaury De Barros, Julien Francisco Zaldivar-Jolissaint, Dominique Hoffmann, Anne-Sophie Job-Chapron, Lorella Minotti, Philippe Kahane, Emmanuel De Schlichting, Stephan Chabardès

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Amaury De BarrosDepartment of Neurosurgery, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France.
Julien Francisco Zaldivar-JolissaintCHU Grenoble Alpes, Clinical University of Neurosurgery, Grenoble, France.
Dominique HoffmannCHU Grenoble Alpes, Clinical University of Neurosurgery, Grenoble, France.
Anne-Sophie Job-ChapronCHU Grenoble Alpes, Clinical University of Neurology, Grenoble, France.
Lorella MinottiCHU Grenoble Alpes, Clinical University of Neurology, Grenoble, France.
Philippe KahaneCHU Grenoble Alpes, Clinical University of Neurology, Grenoble, France.
Emmanuel De SchlichtingCHU Grenoble Alpes, Clinical University of Neurosurgery, Grenoble, France.
Stephan ChabardèsCHU Grenoble Alpes, Clinical University of Neurosurgery, Grenoble, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stereo-electro-encephalography (SEEG) is an invasive, surgical, and electrophysiological method for three-dimensional registration and mapping of seizure activity in drug-resistant epilepsy. It allows the accurate analysis of spatio-temporal seizure activity by multiple intraparenchymal depth electrodes. The technique requires rigorous non-invasive pre-SEEG evaluation (clinical, video-EEG, and neuroimaging investigations) in order to plan the insertion of the SEEG electrodes with minimal risk and maximal recording accuracy. The resulting recordings are used to precisely define the surgical limits of resection of the epileptogenic zone in relation to adjacent eloquent structures. Since the initial description of the technique by Talairach and Bancaud in the 1950's, several techniques of electrode insertion have been used with accuracy and relatively few complications. In the last decade, robot-assisted surgery has emerged as a safe, accurate, and time-saving electrode insertion technique due to its unparalleled potential for orthogonal and oblique insertion trajectories, guided by rigorous computer-assisted planning. SEEG exploration of the insular cortex remains difficult due to its anatomical location, hidden by the temporal and frontoparietal opercula. Furthermore, the close vicinity of Sylvian vessels makes surgical electrode insertion challenging. Some epilepsy surgery teams remain cautious about insular exploration due to the potential of neurovascular injury. However, several authors have published encouraging results regarding the technique's accuracy and safety in both children and adults. We will review the indications, techniques, and outcomes of insular SEEG exploration with emphasis on robot-assisted implantation.

Indexed as

epilepsyepilepsy surgery planningrobot-assisted surgery (RAS)/computer assisted surgery (CAS)SEEG (stereoelectroencephalography)stereotaxic

Identifiers

PMID33041978
PMCPMC7527495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.