Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33041882›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2020

Gibbs-Slice Sampling Algorithm for Estimating the Four-Parameter Logistic Model.

Jiwei Zhang, Jing Lu, Hang Du, Zhaoyuan Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jiwei ZhangKey Lab of Statistical Modeling and Data Analysis of Yunnan Province, School of Mathematics and Statistics, Yunnan University, Kunming, China.
Jing LuKey Laboratory of Applied Statistics of MOE, School of Mathematics and Statistics, Northeast Normal University, Changchun, China.
Hang DuKey Laboratory of Applied Statistics of MOE, School of Mathematics and Statistics, Northeast Normal University, Changchun, China.
Zhaoyuan ZhangKey Laboratory of Applied Statistics of MOE, School of Mathematics and Statistics, Northeast Normal University, Changchun, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The four-parameter logistic (4PL) model has recently attracted much interest in educational testing and psychological measurement. This paper develops a new Gibbs-slice sampling algorithm for estimating the 4PL model parameters in a fully Bayesian framework. Here, the Gibbs algorithm is employed to improve the sampling efficiency by using the conjugate prior distributions in updating asymptote parameters. A slice sampling algorithm is used to update the 2PL model parameters, which overcomes the dependence of the Metropolis-Hastings algorithm on the proposal distribution (tuning parameters). In fact, the Gibbs-slice sampling algorithm not only improves the accuracy of parameter estimation, but also enhances sampling efficiency. Simulation studies are conducted to show the good performance of the proposed Gibbs-slice sampling algorithm and to investigate the impact of different choices of prior distribution on the accuracy of parameter estimation. Based on Markov chain Monte Carlo samples from the posterior distributions, the deviance information criterion and the logarithm of the pseudomarginal likelihood are considered to assess the model fittings. Moreover, a detailed analysis of PISA data is carried out to illustrate the proposed methodology.

Indexed as

Bayesian inferencefour-parameter logistic modelitem response theorymodel assessmentpotential scale reduction factorslice sampling algorithm

Identifiers

PMID33041882
PMCPMC7530206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.