Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33041730›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of integrated care2020

Refining Program Theory for a Place-Based Integrated Care Initiative in Sydney, Australia.

John Eastwood, Salwa Barmaky, Sally Hansen, Erin Millere, Suzanne Ratcliff, Penelope Fotheringham, Heidi Coupland, Denise De Souza

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of integrated care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

John EastwoodSchool of Women's and Children's Health, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, AU.
Salwa BarmakySchool of Women's and Children's Health, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, AU.
Sally HansenCommunity Health Services, Sydney Local Health District, Camperdown, NSW, AU.
Erin MillereCommunity Health Services, Sydney Local Health District, Camperdown, NSW, AU.
Suzanne RatcliffCommunity Health Services, Sydney Local Health District, Camperdown, NSW, AU.
Penelope FotheringhamCommunity Health Services, Sydney Local Health District, Camperdown, NSW, AU.
Heidi CouplandDrug Health Services, Sydney Local Health District, Camperdown NSW, AU.
Denise De SouzaCentre for Research in Education, Torrens University Australia, Melbourne, VIC, AU.
Sydney Local Health District · AUTorrens University Australia · AUUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe Healthy Homes and Neighbourhoods (HHAN) Integrated Care Program seeks to enhance vulnerable family engagement with health and social services through a care coordination model. Besides servicing families in Sydney, HHAN has also established place-based initiatives (PBIs) in areas of disadvantage such as Redfern. The Redfern PBI co-locates HHAN with housing, drug and alcohol services, and financial and legal services. This integration aims to facilitate service access and multi-agency support for vulnerable families in Redfern. Hence, this study aims to evaluate for whom, when and why HHAN's PBI at Redfern works, or not, and what are its outcomes.

methodsThe project utilises critical realist methodology to undertake a qualitative evaluation of the impact of the PBI on clients, services and the community. Purposive sampling was used to identify 21 participants including HHAN clients, HHAN staff and stakeholders (HHAN partners). In-depth, semi-structured interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, coded and analysed using a context (C), intervention (I), mechanism (M) outcome (O) (CIMO) approach to abductive analysis.

resultsFive key CIMO configurations of the Redfern PBI emerged - whole-of-family involvement, flexibility, trust, building connections and co-location. Whilst each theory had specific outcomes, overall client outcomes included improved access to services, better outlook, empowerment and engagement with services. Service outcomes included increased collaboration and foundation for integration between HHAN and other services. Negative outcomes included lack of full integration, the risk associated with integration and difficulty evaluating impact.

conclusionThis study successfully refined the program theory for subsequent use in later implementation of critical realist evaluation studies.

Indexed as

critical realismdesignintegrated careplace-based initiative

Identifiers

PMID33041730
PMCPMC7528678
OpenAlexW3088081394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.