Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33041696›Full record

ArticleJournal of interventional cardiology2020

Safety and Tolerability of Sodium Thiosulfate in Patients with an Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Coronary Angiography: A Dose-Escalation Safety Pilot Study (SAFE-ACS).

Marie-Sophie L Y de Koning, Solmaz Assa, Carlijn G Maagdenberg, Dirk J van Veldhuisen, Andreas Pasch, Harry van Goor, Erik Lipsic, Pim van der Harst

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of interventional cardiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Sulfide regulation and catabolism in health and disease.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Advances of HAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  7. Anserine and Carnosine Induce HSP70-Dependent HAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. HBiomolecules · 2022
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Marie-Sophie L Y de KoningUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Cardiology, Groningen, 9713 GZ, Netherlands.
Solmaz AssaUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Cardiology, Groningen, 9713 GZ, Netherlands.
Carlijn G MaagdenbergUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Cardiology, Groningen, 9713 GZ, Netherlands.
Dirk J van VeldhuisenUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Cardiology, Groningen, 9713 GZ, Netherlands.
Andreas PaschInstitute for Physiology and Pathophysiology, Johannes Kepler University, Linz 4040, Austria.
Harry van GoorUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Pathology and Medical Biology, Groningen, 9713 GZ, Netherlands.
Erik LipsicUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Cardiology, Groningen, 9713 GZ, Netherlands.
Pim van der HarstUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Cardiology, Groningen, 9713 GZ, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2713-686X
University Medical Center Groningen · NLJohannes Kepler University of Linz · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn animal studies, hydrogen sulfide (H

methodsEighteen patients, undergoing coronary angiography for ACS, received STS intravenously immediately after arrival at the catheterization laboratory according to a "3 + 3 dose-escalation design" with fixed dosing endpoint (0, 2.5, 5, 10, 12.5, and 15 grams). This first dose STS was combined with verapamil and nitroglycerin required for transradial procedures. A second dose STS was administered 6 hours later. Primary endpoint was dose-limiting toxicity, defined as significant hemodynamic instability or death up to 24 hours or before discharge from the coronary care unit. Secondary outcomes included the occurrence of anaphylaxis, nausea, vomiting, and systolic blood pressure (SBP) course.

resultsSixteen patients received two dosages of STS and two patients one dosage. None of the patients reached the primary endpoint, nor experienced a serious adverse event. We observed a clinically well-tolerated decline in SBP 1 hour after administration of the first STS dose and concomitant verapamil/nitroglycerin. SBP for all patients together reduced 16.8 (8.1-25.5) mmHg (

conclusionThis is the first report on sodium thiosulfate administration in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Our data suggest that sodium thiosulfate was well tolerated in this setting. The potential benefit of this intervention has to be examined in larger studies.

Indexed as

Coronary AngiographyThiosulfatesAcute Coronary SyndromeAdultDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial Reperfusion InjuryPilot ProjectsProtective AgentsProtective Agentssodium thiosulfateThiosulfates

Identifiers

PMID33041696
PMCPMC7532357
OpenAlexW3089314470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.