Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33041690›Full record

ReviewSeminars in plastic surgery2020

Propeller Flaps for Hand and Digit Reconstruction.

Pierluigi Tos, Alessandro Crosio, Pierfrancesco Pugliese, Alexandru Valentin Georgescu

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in plastic surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Pierluigi TosHand Surgery and Reconstructive Microsurgery Department, ASST Gaetano Pini-CTO, Milan, Italy.
Alessandro CrosioHand Surgery and Reconstructive Microsurgery Department, ASST Gaetano Pini-CTO, Milan, Italy.
Pierfrancesco PugliesePlastic and Reconstructive Surgery Department, AOU Policlinico Paolo Giaccone, Palermo, Italy.
Alexandru Valentin GeorgescuPlastic Surgery and Reconstructive Microsurgery Department, Clinical Hospital of Rehabilitation, University of Medicine Iuliu Hatieganu, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Istituto Ortopedico Gaetano Pini · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico "Paolo Giaccone" di Palermo · ITIuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The reconstruction of soft tissue defects of the hand, as seen often after trauma or tumor excision, is a challenge due to the great differentiation of tissues depending on the hand area involved. The classical intrinsic "workhorse flaps" of the hand are associated with a significant donor-site morbidity. Capturing perforator vessels in discrete donor areas can reduce the amount of soft tissue that has to be dissected and included in what now would be a perforator flap, while also insuring robust vascularization of those transferred tissues. Moreover, the presence of perforator vessels both on the dorsal and volar sides of the hand allows harvest of perforator flaps that will respect the like-with-like principle by maintaining the main characteristics of volar and dorsal skin as desired. However, the dissection of these flaps, especially those based on volar palmar and digital perforators, still requires microsurgical skills to preserve the fine vascularization of these flaps. These small flaps are also amenable for application of the propeller flap concept. This is an especially valuable means for preserving the length of an amputated finger where bone is exposed by using more proximal uninjured tissues. Although in general only a short dissection is required to raise a propeller flap in this region, most often the donor site will have to be closed by a skin graft.

Indexed as

amputationdigithandperforator flapspropeller flaps

Identifiers

PMID33041690
PMCPMC7542211
OpenAlexW3087779743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.