Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33041631›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental modelling & software : with environment data news2021

Socio-technical scales in socio-environmental modeling: Managing a system-of-systems modeling approach.

Takuya Iwanaga, Hsiao-Hsuan Wang, Serena H Hamilton, Volker Grimm, Tomasz E Koralewski, Alejandro Salado, Sondoss Elsawah, Saman Razavi, Jing Yang, Pierre Glynn and 10 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental modelling & software : with environment data news, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
10.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Progress in modeling dynamic systems for sustainable development.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 15 institutions in 8 countries.

Takuya IwanagaInstitute for Water Futures and Fenner School of Environment and Society, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
Hsiao-Hsuan WangEcological Systems Laboratory, Department of Ecology and Conservation Biology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA.
Serena H HamiltonInstitute for Water Futures and Fenner School of Environment and Society, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
Volker GrimmHelmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Department of Ecological Modelling, Leipzig, Germany.
Tomasz E KoralewskiEcological Systems Laboratory, Department of Ecology and Conservation Biology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA.
Alejandro SaladoGrado Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, USA.
Sondoss ElsawahInstitute for Water Futures and Fenner School of Environment and Society, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
Saman RazaviGlobal Institute for Water Security, School of Environment and Sustainability, Department of Civil, Geological, and Environmental Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Jing YangNational Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, New Zealand.
Pierre GlynnU.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA, USA.
Jennifer BadhamCentre for Research in Social Simulation, University of Surrey, Guildford, GU2 7XH, United Kingdom.
Alexey VoinovCenter on Persuasive Systems for Wise Adaptive Living (PERSWADE), Faculty of Engineering & IT, University of Technology, Sydney, Australia.
Min ChenKey Laboratory of Virtual Geographic Environment (Ministry of Education of PRC), Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, 210023, China.
William E GrantEcological Systems Laboratory, Department of Ecology and Conservation Biology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA.
Tarla Rai PetersonEnvironmental Science and Engineering Program, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX, 79968, USA.
Karin FrankHelmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Department of Ecological Modelling, Leipzig, Germany.
Gary ShenkU.S Geological Survey, Chesapeake Bay Program, Annapolis, MD, 21403, USA.
C Michael BartonCenter for Social Dynamics & Complexity, School of Human Evolution & Social Change, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.
Anthony J JakemanInstitute for Water Futures and Fenner School of Environment and Society, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
John C LittleDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, USA.
Texas A&M University · USAustralian National University · AUHelmholtz Centre for Environmental Research · DEVirginia Tech · USArizona State University · USAustralian Defence Force Academy · AUChesapeake Bay Program · USCSIRO Land and Water · AUNanjing Normal University · CNNational Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research · NZThe University of Texas at El Paso · USUnited States Department of the Interior · USUniversity of Saskatchewan · CAUniversity of Surrey · GBUniversity of Technology Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

System-of-systems approaches for integrated assessments have become prevalent in recent years. Such approaches integrate a variety of models from different disciplines and modeling paradigms to represent a socio-environmental (or social-ecological) system aiming to holistically inform policy and decision-making processes. Central to the system-of-systems approaches is the representation of systems in a multi-tier framework with nested scales. Current modeling paradigms, however, have disciplinary-specific lineage, leading to inconsistencies in the conceptualization and integration of socio-environmental systems. In this paper, a multidisciplinary team of researchers, from engineering, natural and social sciences, have come together to detail socio-technical practices and challenges that arise in the consideration of scale throughout the socio-environmental modeling process. We identify key paths forward, focused on explicit consideration of scale and uncertainty, strengthening interdisciplinary communication, and improvement of the documentation process. We call for a grand vision (and commensurate funding) for holistic system-of-systems research that engages researchers, stakeholders, and policy makers in a multi-tiered process for the co-creation of knowledge and solutions to major socio-environmental problems.

Indexed as

Integrated modelingInterdisciplinary modelingScale issuesSocial-ecological modelingSystem-of-systems approach

Identifiers

PMID33041631
PMCPMC7537632
OpenAlexW3092390191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.