Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33041342›Full record

ArticleNature2020

Research integrity: nine ways to move from talk to walk.

Niels Mejlgaard, Lex M Bouter, George Gaskell, Panagiotis Kavouras, Nick Allum, Anna-Kathrine Bendtsen, Costas A Charitidis, Nik Claesen, Kris Dierickx, Anna Domaradzka and 11 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Irreproducible research and a typology of replication efforts.Research integrity and peer review · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Niels Mejlgaard
Lex M Bouter
George Gaskell
Panagiotis Kavouras
Nick Allum
Anna-Kathrine Bendtsen
Costas A Charitidis
Nik Claesen
Kris Dierickx
Anna Domaradzka
Andrea Reyes Elizondo
Nicole Foeger
Maura Hiney
Wolfgang Kaltenbrunner
Krishma Labib
Ana Marušić
Mads P Sørensen
Tine Ravn
Rea Ščepanović
Joeri K Tijdink
Giuseppe A Veltri

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Codes of EthicsEthics, ResearchHumansResearchResearch PersonnelScientific MisconductInstitutionsPolicyResearch management

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.