ArticleBurns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries2021
Recommendations for burns care in mass casualty incidents: WHO Emergency Medical Teams Technical Working Group on Burns (WHO TWGB) 2017-2020.
Article in Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed.
- Key components for responding to burn mass casualty incidents: a comprehensive systematic literature review.International journal of emergency medicine · 2026Review
- Automated Classification of Second- and Third-Degree Burn Images Using Convolutional Neural Networks.European burn journal · 2026Article
- Disaster Medicine Training for Medical Students in Lebanon: Quasi-Experimental Comparison of e-Learning and Face-to-Face Modalities.JMIR medical education · 2026Article
- Advancing emergency medical team classification in MENA region: a qualitative study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Local Understandings and First Aid Responses to Burn Injuries: A Phenomenological Study in an Urban Indonesian Community.Acta medica Philippina · 2026Article
- A Prospective Observational Study to Determine the Efficacy of a Theatre Prioritisation Tool in Optimal Utilisation of Limited Theatre Time for Deep Burn Injury in a Resource-Restricted Setting.European burn journal · 2025Article
- An overview of thermosensitive hydrogel based nanocomposites for high temperature and fire resistance applications.iScience · 2025Review
- Barriers and facilitators to implementing enteral resuscitation for major burn injuries: Reflections from Nepalese care providers.Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries · 2025Article
- The impact of Albumin Administration on Mortality and Resuscitation Volume in Burn Resuscitation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Bulletin of emergency and trauma · 2025Review
- Adapted approaches to initial fluid management of patients with major burns in resource-limited settings: A systematic review.Burns open : an international open access journal for burn injuries · 2024Review
- Oral/enteral fluid resuscitation in the initial management of major burns: A systematic review and meta-analysis of human and animal studies.Burns open : an international open access journal for burn injuries · 2024Review
- Disaster-Related Wound Care: A Scoping Review.Nursing open · 2024Article
- Resource Requirements in a Burn Mass Casualty Event.European burn journal · 2024Article
- Consumer focus group testing with stakeholders to generate an enteral resuscitation training flipbook for primary health center and first-level hospital providers in Nepal.Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries · 2024Article
- Burn Wound Care Strategies for the Battlefield and Austere Settings.European burn journal · 2024Review
- Enteral Resuscitation: A Field-Expedient Treatment Strategy for Burn Shock during Wartime and in Other Austere Settings.European burn journal · 2024Review
- The emergency medical teams initiative in the WHO African region: a review of the development and progress over the past 7 years.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Demographic Assessment of Burn Injuries in Iranian Patients.Bulletin of emergency and trauma · 2024Article
- Emergency medical services preparedness in mass casualty incidents: A qualitative study.Health science reports · 2023Article
- Reimagining natural hazards and disaster preparedness: charting a new course for the future.BMC public health · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Health and logistical needs in emergencies have been well recognised. The last 7 years has witnessed improved professionalisation and standardisation of care for disaster affected communities - led in part by the World Health Organisation Emergency Medical Team (EMT) initiative. Mass casualty incidents (MCIs) resulting in burn injuries present unique challenges. Burn management benefits from specialist skills, expert knowledge, and timely availability of specialist resources. With burn MCIs occurring globally, and wide variance in existing burn care capacity, the need to strengthen burn care capability is evident. Although some high-income countries have well-established disaster management plans, including burn specific plans, many do not - the majority of countries where burn mass casualty events occur are without such established plans. Developing globally relevant recommendations is a first step in addressing this deficit and increasing preparedness to deal with such disasters. Global burn experts were invited to a succession of Technical Working Group on burns (TWGB) meetings to: 1) review literature on burn care in MCIs; and 2) define and agree on recommendations for burn care in MCIs. The resulting 22 recommendations provide a framework to guide national and international specialist burn teams and health facilities to support delivery of safe care and improved outcomes to burn patients in MCIs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.