Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33041101›Full record

ArticleVaccine2020

How acceptable is adolescent self-consent for the HPV vaccination: Findings from a qualitative study in south-west England.

Suzanne Audrey, Michelle Farr, Marion Roderick, Karen Evans, Harriet Fisher

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Suzanne AudreyPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. Electronic address: suzanne.audrey@bristol.ac.uk.
Michelle FarrPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK; The National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West) at University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK.
Marion RoderickDepartment of Paediatric Immunology & Infectious Diseases, Bristol Children's Hospital, Bristol, UK.
Karen EvansHead of School Nursing (Sirona) and Specialist Nursing Services, Bristol and South Gloucestershire, UK.
Harriet FisherPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
University of Bristol · GBBristol Royal Hospital for Children · GBUniversity Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

British Heart FoundationCancer Research UKMedical Research CouncilWellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHuman Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination programmes have the potential to reduce the incidence of cervical cancer. The preferred age for HPV vaccination is 12-13 years for optimal benefit. The legal framework in England allows adolescents to be vaccinated without parental consent if they are assessed as competent. A 'South West Template Pathway on Self Consent for School Aged Immunisations' was developed to improve uptake of immunisations in south-west England. STUDY

aimTo examine how acceptable the new procedures are to the young women, parents and carers, school staff and immunisation nurses involved.

methodsThe research was undertaken in two local authorities in south-west England during the 2017/18 and 2018/19 programme years. Semi-structured digitally recorded interviews were undertaken with 53 participants: one health service manager, three immunisation nurses, five staff at alternative education providers, three staff at mainstream schools, 19 young women and 22 parents. All recordings were transcribed verbatim and thematic analysis was undertaken, assisted by NVivo software.

resultsMost participants were not fully aware of the legal framework that enables a young person to self-consent to vaccination. There was a strong presumption that parents should make decisions affecting the health of their children. The preferred age at which the HPV vaccination is administered (12-13 years) contributed to reluctance in endorsing self-consent which was thought to have the potential to break down trust between parents and school staff, and within families. In practice, formal self-consent was rare.

conclusionUnresolved issues in relation to adolescent self-consent include public and professional perceptions of young people's rights and abilities to take responsibility for decisions affecting their health, and concerns about the impact of self-consent on relationships both within families and between professionals and the families they serve.

Indexed as

Papillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdolescentChildEnglandFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansParental ConsentParentsPatient Acceptance of Health CareVaccinationPapillomavirus VaccinesAdolescent healthConsentHPVQualitative researchVaccination

Identifiers

PMID33041101
PMCPMC7604563
OpenAlexW3091851691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.