Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33041014›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of anaesthesia2021

Automated closed-loop versus manually controlled norepinephrine infusion in patients undergoing intermediate- to high-risk abdominal surgery: a randomised controlled trial.

Alexandre Joosten, Dragos Chirnoaga, Philippe Van der Linden, Luc Barvais, Brenton Alexander, Jacques Duranteau, Jean-Louis Vincent, Maxime Cannesson, Joseph Rinehart

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of anaesthesia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04089644 (Physician-Directed vs Computer-Assisted Norepinephrine Administration in Patients Undergoing Major Abdominal Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04089644 nacompletednot on this map

Physician-Directed vs Computer-Assisted Norepinephrine Administration in Patients Undergoing Major Abdominal Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorErasme University HospitalRan2019 to 2020Enrolled30ConditionsHypotensionArmsclosed-loop system, Manual adjustment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Goal-directed therapy: what is the goal again?Perioperative medicine (London, England) · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Closing the loop: automation in anesthesiology is coming.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2024
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Alexandre JoostenDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium; Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Hôpital De Bicêtre, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France. Electronic address: Alexandre.Joosten@erasme.ulb.ac.be.
Dragos ChirnoagaDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Philippe Van der LindenDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Brugmann Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Luc BarvaisDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Brenton AlexanderDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Jacques DuranteauDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Hôpital De Bicêtre, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.
Jean-Louis VincentDepartment of Intensive Care, Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Maxime CannessonDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Joseph RinehartDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Care, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.
Université Libre de Bruxelles · BEUniversité Paris-Sud · FRUniversity of California, Irvine · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of California San Diego · US

Funding

UC BRAID Center for Accelerated Innovation COVID-19 diagnostic project developmentU54HL119893 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI PALAZZOLO, MICHAEL J · 2013 to 2020
$18.3M
Machine Learning of Physiological Waveforms and Electronic Health Record Data to Predict, Diagnose, and Treat Hemodynamic Instability in Surgical PatientsR01HL144692 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI CANNESSON, MAXIME · 2019 to 2023
$3.5M
Biomedical Informatics Tools for Applied Perioperative PhysiologyR01EB029751 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI CANNESSON, MAXIME · 2020 to 2023
$2.5M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL144692NHLBI NIH HHS U54 HL119893NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB029751
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHypotension occurs frequently during surgery and may be associated with adverse complications. Vasopressor titration is frequently used to correct hypotension, but requires considerable time and attention, potentially reducing the time available for other clinical duties. To overcome this issue, we have developed a closed-loop vasopressor (CLV) controller to help correct hypotension more efficiently. The aim of this randomised controlled study was to evaluate whether the CLV controller was superior to traditional vasopressor management at minimising hypotension in patients undergoing abdominal surgery.

methodsThirty patients scheduled for elective intermediate-to high-risk abdominal surgery were randomised into two groups. In the CLV group, hypotension was corrected automatically via the CLV controller system, which adjusted the rate of a norepinephrine infusion according to MAP values recorded using an advanced haemodynamic device. In the control group, management of hypotension consisted of standard, manual adjustment of the norepinephrine infusion. The primary outcome was the percentage of time that a patient was hypotensive, defined as MAP <90% of their baseline value, during surgery.

resultsThe percentage of time patients were hypotensive during surgery was 10 times less in the CVL group than in the control group (1.6 [0.9-2.3]% vs 15.4 [9.9-24.3]%; difference: 13 [95% confidence interval: 9-19]; P<0.0001). The CVL group also spent much less time with MAP <65 mm Hg (0.2 [0.0-0.4]% vs 4.5 [1.1-7.9]%; P<0.0001).

conclusionsIn patients undergoing intermediate- to high-risk surgery under general anaesthesia, computer-assisted adjustment of norepinephrine infusion significantly decreases the incidence of hypotension compared with manual control. CLINICAL

trial registrationNCT04089644.

Indexed as

AbdomenElective Surgical ProceduresFemaleHumansHypotensionInfusions, IntravenousIntraoperative ComplicationsMaleMiddle AgedNorepinephrineRiskTreatment OutcomeVasoconstrictor AgentsNorepinephrineVasoconstrictor Agentsclosed-loophaemodynamichypertensionhypotensionintraoperative monitoringnorepinephrinesafetyvasopressor

Identifiers

PMID33041014
PMCPMC8489152
OpenAlexW3092411747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.