Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33040433›Full record

ArticleCancer science2021

Human papillomavirus vaccine to prevent cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in Japan: A nationwide case-control study.

Sayaka Ikeda, Yutaka Ueda, Megumi Hara, Asami Yagi, Tetsuhisa Kitamura, Yuri Kitamura, Hiroshi Konishi, Tadao Kakizoe, Masayuki Sekine, Takayuki Enomoto and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sayaka IkedaDivision of Environmental Medicine and Population Sciences, Department of Social and Environmental Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7948-8990
Yutaka UedaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.
Megumi HaraDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, Saga, Japan.
Asami YagiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3222-5963
Tetsuhisa KitamuraDivision of Environmental Medicine and Population Sciences, Department of Social and Environmental Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.
Yuri KitamuraDivision of Environmental Medicine and Population Sciences, Department of Social and Environmental Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7665-3524
Hiroshi KonishiThe Japan Cancer Society, Tokyo, Japan.
Tadao KakizoeThe Japan Cancer Society, Tokyo, Japan.
Masayuki SekineDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan.
Takayuki EnomotoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan.
Tomotaka SobueDivision of Environmental Medicine and Population Sciences, Department of Social and Environmental Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2817-3483
The University of Osaka · JPJapan Cancer Society · JPNiigata University · JPSaga University · JP

Funding

the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development 15ck0106103h0102The Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare, Japan H28-SHINKOGYOSEI-SHITEI-004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cervical cancer remains among the most common cancers in women worldwide and can be prevented by vaccination. The Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan suspended active recommendation of regular human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines in 2013 because of various symptoms including chronic pain and motor impairment. This nationwide case-control study from April 2013 to March 2017 targeted women aged 20-24 years old at cervical screening. We compared HPV vaccination exposure between those with abnormal and normal cytology. Abnormal cytology was classified based on the results of histological test and we calculated the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of the above endpoints and vaccination exposure using the conditional logistic regression model and estimated vaccine effectiveness using the formula (1 - OR) × 100. A total of 2483 cases and 12 296 controls (one-to-five matching) were eligible in 31 municipalities in Japan. The distribution of histological abnormalities among cases was 797 CIN1 (including dysplasia) (32.1%), 165 CIN2 (6.7%), 44 CIN3 (1.8%), and eight squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) (0.3%). The OR of HPV vaccination compared with no vaccination for abnormal cytology, CIN1+, CIN2+, and CIN3+ versus controls was 0.42 (95% CI, 0.34-0.50), 0.42 (95% CI, 0.31-0.58), 0.25 (95% CI, 0.12-0.54), and 0.19 (95% CI, 0.03-1.15), respectively, equating to a vaccine effectiveness of 58.5%, 57.9%, 74.8%, and 80.9%, respectively. Eight patients had SCC, none was vaccinated. This nationwide case-control study in Japan demonstrated a substantial risk reduction in abnormal cytology and CIN among women who did versus those who did not receive HPV vaccination.

Indexed as

Case-Control StudiesFemaleHumansJapanPapillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesUterine Cervical DysplasiaUterine Cervical NeoplasmsYoung AdultPapillomavirus Vaccinescase-control studycervical intraepithelial neoplasiaHPV vaccinehuman papillomavirusvaccine effectiveness

Identifiers

PMID33040433
PMCPMC7893998
OpenAlexW3092408501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.