ReviewThe protein journal2020
The Last Secret of Protein Folding: The Real Relationship Between Long-Range Interactions and Local Structures.
Review in The protein journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Proteins Inside the HSP60/HSP10 Fold Under a Constant Electric Field: Potential Implications for the Protein Folding Problem.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Unlocking New Approaches to Urolithiasis ManagementCurrent pharmaceutical biotechnology · 2024Review
- Making nanoparticles protein-like.Nanomedicine (London, England) · 2024Article
- AIMD-Chig: Exploring the conformational space of a 166-atom protein Chignolin with ab initio molecular dynamics.Scientific data · 2023Article
- PEGylation of Goldbody: PEG-aided conformational engineering of peptides on gold nanoparticles.RSC advances · 2022Article
- [Progresses on active targeting liposome drug delivery systems for tumor therapy].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2022Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The protein folding problem has been extensively studied for decades, and hundreds of thousands of protein structures have been solved. Yet, how proteins fold from a linear peptide chain to their unique 3D structures is not fully understood. With key clues having emerged unexpectedly from the field of nanoscience, a "Confined Lowest Energy Fragment" (CLEF) hypothesis was proposed. The CLEF hypothesis states that a protein chain can be divided into CLEFs, the semi-independent folding units, by a small number of key residues that form key long-range interactions. The native structure of a CLEF is the lowest energy state under the constraints of the key long-range interactions, but the native structure of the whole protein is not necessary the lowest energy state as Anfinsen's thermodynamic hypothesis suggested. The CLEF hypothesis proposes a unified CLEF mechanism for protein folding, basically a two-step process. In the first step, the favorable enthalpy of CLEFs for native structures quickly brings those residues for the key long-range interactions together, forming intermediates corresponding to the so-called hydrophobic collapse. In the second step, those collapsed key residues shuffle for the right combination to form the native key long-range interactions. The CLEF hypothesis provides a simple solution to all protein folding paradoxes, and proposes a "CLEF Age" or "Stone Age" for the prebiotic evolution of proteins.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33040262What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.