Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33040262›Full record

ReviewThe protein journal2020

The Last Secret of Protein Folding: The Real Relationship Between Long-Range Interactions and Local Structures.

Aoneng Cao

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in The protein journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Unlocking New Approaches to Urolithiasis ManagementCurrent pharmaceutical biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  4. Making nanoparticles protein-like.Nanomedicine (London, England) · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. [Progresses on active targeting liposome drug delivery systems for tumor therapy].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Aoneng CaoInstitute of Nanochemistry and Nanobiology, Shanghai University, Shanghai, 200444, China. ancao@shu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1168-3623

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The protein folding problem has been extensively studied for decades, and hundreds of thousands of protein structures have been solved. Yet, how proteins fold from a linear peptide chain to their unique 3D structures is not fully understood. With key clues having emerged unexpectedly from the field of nanoscience, a "Confined Lowest Energy Fragment" (CLEF) hypothesis was proposed. The CLEF hypothesis states that a protein chain can be divided into CLEFs, the semi-independent folding units, by a small number of key residues that form key long-range interactions. The native structure of a CLEF is the lowest energy state under the constraints of the key long-range interactions, but the native structure of the whole protein is not necessary the lowest energy state as Anfinsen's thermodynamic hypothesis suggested. The CLEF hypothesis proposes a unified CLEF mechanism for protein folding, basically a two-step process. In the first step, the favorable enthalpy of CLEFs for native structures quickly brings those residues for the key long-range interactions together, forming intermediates corresponding to the so-called hydrophobic collapse. In the second step, those collapsed key residues shuffle for the right combination to form the native key long-range interactions. The CLEF hypothesis provides a simple solution to all protein folding paradoxes, and proposes a "CLEF Age" or "Stone Age" for the prebiotic evolution of proteins.

Indexed as

Models, MolecularProtein FoldingHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsKineticsProteinsThermodynamicsProteinsCLEF ageCLEF hypothesisLevinthal’s paradoxLong-range interactionProtein evolutionProtein folding

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.