ArticleBrain imaging and behavior2021
A multi-domain prognostic model of disorder of consciousness using resting-state fMRI and laboratory parameters.
Article in Brain imaging and behavior, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multimodal Assessment of Consciousness with Brain-Computer Interfaces and Artificial Intelligence: From Acquired Brain Injury to Neurodegenerative Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Prognostic factors in prolonged disorders of consciousness: a narrative review.Reviews in the neurosciences · 2026Review
- Motor Intention Quantization for Patients With Disorders of Consciousness by Multimodal BCI Combining Electroencephalography and Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2025Article
- Altered oral microbiomes in patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness.Journal of oral microbiology · 2025Article
- Prognostic Evaluation of Disorders of Consciousness by Using Resting-State fMRI: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Study of a precise treatment protocol for patients with consciousness disorders based on the brain network analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Article
- Common Data Elements for Disorders of Consciousness: Recommendations from the Working Group on Neuroimaging.Neurocritical care · 2023Article
- Can Respiration Complexity Help the Diagnosis of Disorders of Consciousness in Rehabilitation?Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Predicting outcome of patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness using machine learning models based on medical complexity.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Applications of Advanced MRI to Disorders of Consciousness.Seminars in neurology · 2022Review
- Disorders of Consciousness Associated With COVID-19: A Prospective Multimodal Study of Recovery and Brain Connectivity.Neurology · 2022Article
- Altered Intestinal Microbiomes and Lipid Metabolism in Patients With Prolonged Disorders of Consciousness.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Article
- A prediction model of clinical outcomes in prolonged disorders of consciousness: A prospective cohort study.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesAlthough laboratory parameters have long been recognized as indicators of outcome of traumatic brain injury (TBI), it remains a challenge to predict the recovery of disorder of consciousness (DOC) in severe brain injury including TBI. Recent advances have shown an association between alterations in brain connectivity and recovery from DOC. In the present study, we developed a prognostic model of DOC recovery via a combination of laboratory parameters and resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI).
methodsFifty-one patients with DOC (age = 52.3 ± 15.2 y, male/female = 31/20) were recruited from Hangzhou Hospital of Zhejiang CAPR and were sub-grouped into conscious (n = 34) and unconscious (n = 17) groups based upon their Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOS-E) scores at 12-month follow-ups after injury. Resting-state functional connectivity, network nodal measures (centrality), and laboratory parameters were obtained from each patient and served as features for support vector machine (SVM) classifications.
resultsWe found that functional connectivity was the most accurate single-domain model (ACC: 70.1% ± 4.5%, P = 0.038, 1000 permutations), followed by degree centrality, betweenness centrality, and laboratory parameters. The stacked multi-domain prognostic model (ACC: 73.4% ± 3.1%, P = 0.005, 1000 permutations) combining all single-domain models yielded a significantly higher accuracy compared to that of the best-performing single-domain model (P = 0.002).
conclusionOur results suggest that laboratory parameters only contribute to the outcome prediction of DOC patients, whereas combining information from neuroimaging and clinical parameters may represent a strategy to achieve a more accurate prognostic model, which may further provide better guidance for clinical management of DOC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33040258What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.