Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33040222›Full record

Observational studyEuropean radiology2021

Infrapopliteal endovascular intervention and the angiosome concept: intraoperative real-time assessment of foot regions' blood volume guides and improves direct revascularization.

Jiangyu Ma, Zhichao Lai, Jiang Shao, Jinsong Lei, Kang Li, Jingjing Wang, Leyin Xu, Lijing Fang, Xiaoxi Yu, Wanting Qi and 5 more

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in European radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jiangyu MaDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Shuaifuyuan 1st, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, People's Republic of China.
Zhichao LaiDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Shuaifuyuan 1st, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, People's Republic of China.
Jiang ShaoDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Shuaifuyuan 1st, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, People's Republic of China.
Jinsong LeiDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Shuaifuyuan 1st, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, People's Republic of China.
Kang LiDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Shuaifuyuan 1st, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, People's Republic of China.
Jingjing WangDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Shuaifuyuan 1st, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, People's Republic of China.
Leyin XuDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Shuaifuyuan 1st, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, People's Republic of China.
Lijing FangDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Shuaifuyuan 1st, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, People's Republic of China.
Xiaoxi YuDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Shuaifuyuan 1st, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, People's Republic of China.
Wanting QiDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Shuaifuyuan 1st, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, People's Republic of China.
Chaonan WangDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Shuaifuyuan 1st, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, People's Republic of China.
Wenteng CaoDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Shuaifuyuan 1st, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, People's Republic of China.
Xiaolong LiuDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Shuaifuyuan 1st, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, People's Republic of China.
Jinghui YuanDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Shuaifuyuan 1st, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, People's Republic of China.
Bao LiuDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Shuaifuyuan 1st, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, People's Republic of China. liubao72@aliyun.com.
Peking Union Medical College Hospital · CNChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CN

Funding

Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission No. Z161100000516093CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences no.2018-I2M-AI-004National College Students Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Program No. 202010023041Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality no. 7182131Non-profit Central Research Institute Fund of Chinese Academy Of Medical Science no. 2019XK320004PUMCH Science Fund of Key Projects for Junior Faculty No. PUMCH-2016-1.20
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThere is no consensus for determining which vessel should be revascularized in patients with multiple diseased infrapopliteal arteries. The angiosome concept may guide a more efficient targeted direct revascularization. Therefore, we conducted a study to assess whether the regional evaluation of foot blood volume may guide direct revascularization (DR) and if it will lead to better perfusion improvement than indirect revascularization (IR).

methodsWe performed a prospective single-center observational cohort study in patients treated in the Department of Vascular Surgery of Peking Union Medical College Hospital from November 2016 to April 2019. Twenty-seven patients treated with endovascular intervention were included. The intraoperative parenchymal blood volume of different foot regions was obtained for each patient using C-arm CT before and after intervention.

resultsThe intervention procedure significantly increased the overall blood volume (48.95 versus 81.97 ml/1000 ml, p = 0.002). Patients with direct revascularization had a 197% blood volume increase while patients with indirect revascularization had a 39% increase (p = 0.028). The preoperative blood volume was higher in patients with mild symptoms than in patients with severe symptoms (58.20 versus 30.45 ml/1000 ml, p = 0.039). However, in regard to postoperative blood volume, no significant difference was discovered between these two groups (75.05 versus 95.01 ml/1000 ml, p = 0.275).

conclusionBased on quantitative measurements, we conclude that overall blood volume can rise significantly after the intervention. Revascularizing the supplying vessel of the ischemic area directly will result in better perfusion improvement than restoring blood supply through the collateral circulation. Preoperative blood volume is associated with preoperative symptoms. KEY POINTS: • Flat panel detector CT can obtain intraoperative perfusion status and guide treatment in endovascular intervention. • Revascularizing the supplying vessel of the ischemic area directly will result in better perfusion improvement than restoring the blood supply through the collateral circulation. • Patients with severer clinical manifestations have lower blood volumes.

Indexed as

Endovascular ProceduresLimb SalvageAmputation, SurgicalBlood VolumeHumansIschemiaProspective StudiesRegional Blood FlowRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeWound HealingAngioplastyBlood volumeIschemiaPerfusion imagingPeripheral arterial disease

Identifiers

PMID33040222
OpenAlexW3092037913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.