ReviewAbdominal radiology (New York)2021
Penile girth augmentation by injectable fillers: a comprehensive review of imaging features and inflammatory complications.
Review in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Complications and management of penile enhancement procedures.Translational andrology and urology · 2025Review
- Foreign Body Granuloma After Polylactic Acid Filler Injection for Penile Girth Enhancement: Three Cases Report.Clinical case reports · 2025Article
- A Novel Application of a Single-Entry Injection Technique for Non-surgical Penile Enlargement: A Case Report.Cureus · 2025Article
- Which Dermal Filler is Better for Penile Augmentation for Aesthetic Purposes? A Prospective, Single-Surgeon Study Based on Real-World Experience.The world journal of men's health · 2025Article
- Reconstruction Using a Scrotal Flap with Autologous Augmentation for Delayed Infection Caused by Penile Filler Injection: A Case Report.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Article
- Penile Girth Injection Complications: A Case Report.Sexual medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the extensive controversy and debate of penile girth augmentation, high demands for such procedures are increasing. Penile inflammation is not common sequel after penile filler augmentation, but when it occurs, it has serious complications that sometimes necessitate emergency surgical intervention. Imaging with a variety of modalities, including ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging, and ascending urethrogrphy plays a paramount role in the detection and assessment of these conditions. Inflammatory conditions after penile girth augmentation using injectable fillers are ranging from local granuloma to penile abscess formation or diffuse cellulitis that may extend to the scrotum, perineum or deep pelvic organs. Rapid diagnosis and evaluation of extensions are important to avoid associated morbidity and permanent deformity. Our purpose is to provide a practical review of relevant penile anatomy, imaging appearance and injection technique of different types of subcutaneous fillers used in penile girth augmentation, and inflammatory complications that may occur after these procedures. Brief descriptions of patient clinical information and imaging features of inflammatory complications will be included and correlated in actual cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33040174What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.