Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33040092›Full record

Trial reportNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2021

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and the explore/exploit trade-off.

Merideth A Addicott, John M Pearson, Julia C Schechter, Jeffrey J Sapyta, Margaret D Weiss, Scott H Kollins

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Individual differences in sequential decision-making.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Troubleshooting Bayesian cognitive models.Psychological methods · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Dopamine and Norepinephrine Differentially Mediate the Exploration-Exploitation Tradeoff.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Merideth A AddicottUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA. maddicott@uams.edu.
John M PearsonDuke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9876-7837
Julia C SchechterDuke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Jeffrey J SapytaDuke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Margaret D WeissUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Scott H KollinsDuke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6847-6935
Duke University · USUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences · USUniversity of Arkansas Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to maximize rewards and minimize the costs of obtaining them is vital to making advantageous explore/exploit decisions. Exploratory decisions are theorized to be greater among individuals with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), potentially due to deficient catecholamine transmission. Here, we examined the effects of ADHD status and methylphenidate, a common ADHD medication, on explore/exploit decisions using a 6-armed bandit task. We hypothesized that ADHD participants would make more exploratory decisions than controls, and that MPH would reduce group differences. On separate study days, adults with (n = 26) and without (n = 23) ADHD completed the bandit task at baseline, and after methylphenidate or placebo in counter-balanced order. Explore/exploit decisions were modeled using reinforcement learning algorithms. ADHD participants made more exploratory decisions (i.e., chose options without the highest expected reward value) and earned fewer points than controls in all three study days, and methylphenidate did not affect these outcomes. Baseline exploratory choices were positively associated with hyperactive ADHD symptoms across all participants. These results support several theoretical models of increased exploratory choices in ADHD and suggest the unexplained variance in ADHD decisions may be due to less value tracking. The inability to suppress actions with little to no reward value may be a key feature of hyperactive ADHD symptoms.

Indexed as

Attention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityCentral Nervous System StimulantsMethylphenidateAdultHumansReinforcement, PsychologyRewardCentral Nervous System StimulantsMethylphenidate

Identifiers

PMID33040092
PMCPMC8027173
OpenAlexW3092442524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.