Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33040076›Full record

ReviewBone marrow transplantation2021

Optimization of nutrition support practices early after hematopoietic cell transplantation.

Kerry K McMillen, Tara Coghlin-Dickson, Peter A Adintori

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Bone marrow transplantation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Patterns of parenteral nutrition use in the inpatient setting: A retrospective cohort study.Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Modern-Era Challenges in the Clinical Management of Graft-Versus-Host Disease.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kerry K McMillenSeattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA, USA. kmcmille@seattlecca.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8899-8562
Tara Coghlin-DicksonStanford Health Care, Stanford, CA, USA.
Peter A AdintoriMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7099-1143
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USSeattle Cancer Care Alliance · USStanford Health Care · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nutrition support is often required during hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) given the gastrointestinal toxicity that frequently precludes adequate protein-calorie intake. This article reviews the latest evidence for enteral versus parenteral nutrition in the adult and pediatric HCT population and addresses key considerations as well as barriers to implement this in practice. Registered Dietitian Nutritionists are key members of the interdisciplinary team to proactively manage enteral nutrition support to provide timely, adequate protein and calories to help prevent malnutrition, loss of lean body mass, and functional decline as well as provide evidence-based diet recommendations. This article also reviews emerging research supporting the role of luminal nutrients to maintain microbiotal diversity.

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationMalnutritionAdultChildEnteral NutritionHumansNutritional SupportParenteral Nutrition

Identifiers

PMID33040076
OpenAlexW3091814354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.