ArticleNeuroImage2021
Robust estimation of noise for electromagnetic brain imaging with the champagne algorithm.
Article in NeuroImage, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impaired Speaking-Induced Suppression Predicts Degraded Agency and Hallucination Severity in Schizophrenia.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2026Article
- Efficient Super-Resolution Bayesian Eletromagnetic Brain Imaging.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2026Article
- Robust interpolation of EEG/MEG sensor time-series via electromagnetic source imaging.Journal of neural engineering · 2025Article
- Structured noise champagne: an empirical Bayesian algorithm for electromagnetic brain imaging with structured noise.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Article
- The effects of spatial leakage correction on the reliability of EEG-based functional connectivity networks.Human brain mapping · 2024Article
- Joint Learning of Full-Structure Noise in Hierarchical Bayesian Regression Models.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2024Article
- Exploring an EM-algorithm for banded regression in computational neuroscience.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- NLGC: Network localized Granger causality with application to MEG directional functional connectivity analysis.NeuroImage · 2022Article
- Empirical Bayesian localization of event-related time-frequency neural activity dynamics.NeuroImage · 2022Article
- Interference suppression techniques for OPM-based MEG: Opportunities and challenges.NeuroImage · 2022Article
- Editorial: Magnetoencephalography (MEG) in Epilepsy and Neurosurgery.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2022Article
- Unification of sparse Bayesian learning algorithms for electromagnetic brain imaging with the majorization minimization framework.NeuroImage · 2021Article
- Exploring the extent of source imaging: Recent advances in noninvasive electromagnetic brain imaging.Current opinion in biomedical engineering · 2021Article
- Clinical Validation of the Champagne Algorithm for Epilepsy Spike Localization.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Robust estimation of the number, location, and activity of multiple correlated brain sources has long been a challenging task in electromagnetic brain imaging from M/EEG data, one that is significantly impacted by interference from spontaneous brain activity, sensor noise, and other sources of artifacts. Recently, we introduced the Champagne algorithm, a novel Bayesian inference algorithm that has shown tremendous success in M/EEG source reconstruction. Inherent to Champagne and most other related Bayesian reconstruction algorithms is the assumption that the noise covariance in sensor data can be estimated from "baseline" or "control" measurements. However, in many scenarios, such baseline data is not available, or is unreliable, and it is unclear how best to estimate the noise covariance. In this technical note, we propose several robust methods to estimate the contributions to sensors from noise arising from outside the brain without the need for additional baseline measurements. The incorporation of these methods for diagonal noise covariance estimation improves the robust reconstruction of complex brain source activity under high levels of noise and interference, while maintaining the performance features of Champagne. Specifically, we show that the resulting algorithm, Champagne with noise learning, is quite robust to initialization and is computationally efficient. In simulations, performance of the proposed noise learning algorithm is consistently superior to Champagne without noise learning. We also demonstrate that, even without the use of any baseline data, Champagne with noise learning is able to reconstruct complex brain activity with just a few trials or even a single trial, demonstrating significant improvements in source reconstruction for electromagnetic brain imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.