ArticleThe Lancet. Global health2020
The necessity for intra-action reviews during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Article in The Lancet. Global health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Intra- and after-action reviews of public health emergencies: report of the Brazilian experience and achievements, 2023 to 2025Evaluación durante y después de una emergencia de salud pública: experiencia y avances de Brasil entre el 2023 y el 2025].Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2026Article
- A conceptual learning analysis of paired after action and intra action reviews for health emergencies.Learning health systems · 2024Article
- Provincial Intra-Action Review of the COVID-19 Vaccination Programme: Opportunities to Improve Vaccine Response in North Kivu, Democratic Republic of Congo.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2024Article
- Organisational learning from the public health response to the COVID-19 pandemic: findings from a qualitative interview study.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine uptake and hesitancy among healthcare workers in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.PLOS global public health · 2024Article
- Sharing lessons learned from COVID-19 vaccine introductions: a global community forum for countries.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- First COVID-19 intra-action review: Experience from Kenya.Journal of global health · 2023Article
- Article
- A methodological approach to intra-action reviews - application and adaptation of existing global guidance during the COVID-19 pandemic response in Ireland, 2021.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2023Article
- Assessment of COVID-19 preparedness response plan on higher education students simulation of WHO intra-action review in Egypt.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Article
- Review of Israel's action and response during the COVID-19 pandemic and tabletop exercise for the evaluation of readiness and resilience-lessons learned 2020-2021.Frontiers in public health · 2023Review
- Exploring the relationship between national governance indicators and speed of initial government response to COVID-19 in low- and middle-income countries.Public health in practice (Oxford, England) · 2022Article
- Assessment of COVID-19 pandemic responses in African countries: thematic synthesis of WHO intra-action review reports.BMJ open · 2022Review
- Using after-action reviews of outbreaks to enhance public health responses: lessons for COVID-19.The Medical journal of Australia · 2022Article
- After Action Reviews of COVID-19 response: Case study of a large tertiary care hospital in Italy.The International journal of health planning and management · 2021Article
- COVID-19 intra-action reviews: potential for a sustained response plan.The Lancet. Global health · 2021Article
- Simulation exercises and after action reviews - analysis of outputs during 2016-2019 to strengthen global health emergency preparedness and response.Globalization and health · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.