Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33038749›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomechanics2020

The relationship between alignment, function and loading in total knee replacement: In-vivo analysis of a unique patient population.

David Williams, Andrew Metcalfe, June Madete, Gemma Whatling, Peter Kempshall, Mark Forster, Kathleen Lyons, Cathy Holt

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomechanics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Step-by-step insight into gait analysis: A narrative review unlocking knee biomechanics.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

David WilliamsCardiff School of Engineering, College of Physical Sciences and Engineering, Cardiff University, UK. Electronic address: williamsd37@cardiff.ac.uk.
Andrew MetcalfeWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
June MadeteDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Kenyatta University, Nairobi, Kenya.
Gemma WhatlingCardiff School of Engineering, College of Physical Sciences and Engineering, Cardiff University, UK.
Peter KempshallGloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Great Western Road, Gloucester, UK.
Mark ForsterCardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK.
Kathleen LyonsUniversity Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK.
Cathy HoltCardiff School of Engineering, College of Physical Sciences and Engineering, Cardiff University, UK.
Cardiff University · GBCardiff and Vale University Health Board · GBGloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBKenyatta University · KEUniversity Hospital of Wales · GBUniversity of Warwick · GB

Funding

Arthritis Research UK 18461Versus Arthritis 20781
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to quantify the effect of total knee replacement (TKR) alignment on in-vivo knee function and loading in a unique patient cohort who have been identified as having a high rate of component mal-alignment. Post-TKR (82.4 ± 6.7 months), gait analysis was performed on 25 patients (27 knees), to calculate knee kinematics and kinetics. For a step activity, video fluoroscopic analysis quantified in-vivo implant kinematics. Frontal plane lower-limb alignment was defined by the Hip-Knee-Ankle angle (HKA) measured on long leg static X-rays. Transverse plane component rotation was calculated from computed tomography scans. Sagittal plane alignment was defined by measuring the flexion angle of the femoral component and the posterior tibial slope angle (PTSA). For gait analysis, a more varus HKA correlated with increased peak and dynamic joint kinetics, predicting 47.6% of Knee Adduction Angular Impulse variance. For the step activity, during step-up and single leg loaded, higher PTSA correlated with a posterior shift in medial compartment Anterior-Posterior (AP) translation. During step-down, higher PTSA correlated with reduced lateral compartment AP translation with a posterior shift in AP translation in both compartments. A more varus HKA correlated with a more posterior medial AP translation and inter-component rotation was related to transverse plan range of motion. This in-vivo study found that frontal plane lower-limb alignment had a significant effect on joint forces during gait but had minimal influence on in-vivo implant kinematics for step activity. PTSA was found to influence in-vivo TKR translations and is therefore an important surgical factor.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeKnee ProsthesisBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansKnee JointRange of Motion, ArticularTibiaArthroscopyFluoroscopyFrontal plane alignmentGait analysisTKR

Identifiers

PMID33038749
PMCPMC7607217
OpenAlexW2149738598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.