ArticleComputers in biology and medicine2020
Improving multi-atlas cardiac structure segmentation of computed tomography angiography: A performance evaluation based on a heterogeneous dataset.
Article in Computers in biology and medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automated Cardiac Reorientation and Slice Extraction in Cine Coronary CT Angiography: Agreement with Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2026Article
- Temporal phase coverage and patient cohort size in deep learning-based cardiac cine computed tomography angiography segmentation.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Longitudinal association of epicardial and thoracic adipose tissues with coronary and cardiac characteristics in psoriasis.Heliyon · 2023Article
- A Multi-Atlas-Based [18F]9-Fluoropropyl-(+)-Dihydrotetrabenazine Positron Emission Tomography Image Segmentation Method for Parkinson's Disease Quantification.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2022Article
- DeepHeartCT: A fully automatic artificial intelligence hybrid framework based on convolutional neural network and multi-atlas segmentation for multi-structure cardiac computed tomography angiography image segmentation.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2022Article
- A deep-learning approach for direct whole-heart mesh reconstruction.Medical image analysis · 2021Article
- The relationship between systemic inflammation and increased left ventricular mass is partly mediated by noncalcified coronary artery disease burden in psoriasis.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2021Article
- Automatic delineation of cardiac substructures using a region-based fully convolutional network.Medical physics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Multi-atlas based segmentation is an effective technique that transforms a representative set of atlas images and labels into a target image for structural segmentation. However, a significant limitation of this approach relates to the fact that the atlas and the target images need to be similar in volume orientation, coverage, or acquisition protocols in order to prevent image misregistration and avoid segmentation fault. In this study, we aim to evaluate the impact of using a heterogeneous Computed Tomography Angiography (CTA) dataset on the performance of a multi-atlas cardiac structure segmentation framework. We propose a generalized technique based upon using the Simple Linear Iterative Clustering (SLIC) supervoxel method to detect a bounding box region enclosing the heart before subsequent cardiac structure segmentation. This technique facilitates our framework to process CTA datasets acquired from distinct imaging protocols and to improve its segmentation accuracy and speed. In a four-way cross comparison based on 60 CTA studies from our institution and 60 CTA datasets from the Multi-Modality Whole Heart Segmentation MICCAI challenge, we show that the proposed framework performs well in segmenting seven different cardiac structures based upon interchangeable atlas and target datasets acquired from different imaging settings. For the overall results, our automated segmentation framework attains a median Dice, mean distance, and Hausdorff distance of 0.88, 1.5 mm, and 9.69 mm over the entire datasets. The average processing time was 1.55 min for both datasets. Furthermore, this study shows that it is feasible to exploit heterogenous datasets from different imaging protocols and institutions for accurate multi-atlas cardiac structure segmentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.