ArticleEnvironmental research2021
A comprehensive risk assessment of toxic elements in international brands of face foundation powders.
Article in Environmental research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Analysis of Ni, Cu, and Fe in Loose Cosmetic Products: A Preliminary Dermal Exposure and Health Risk Assessment.Toxics · 2026Article
- Article
- Environmental impact of the barrage construction on groundwater.Environmental geochemistry and health · 2026Article
- Health Risk Assessment of Metal(loid)s in Black and Dark-Colored Sachet Hair Dyes Purchased from Online Retail Platforms in Thailand.Biological trace element research · 2026Article
- Concentrations and Probabilistic Health Risks of Seven Metals in Face and Eye Cosmetics Across Seven Asian Countries.Toxics · 2026Article
- Heavy metal in cosmetics and its risk to future generation in remote area of Azad Jammu and Kashmir Trarkhel District Sudhnoti.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Analysis of Mercury Concentration in Cosmetic Clays.Toxics · 2025Article
- Theoretical Health Risk Assessment Based on Potentially Toxic Element Profiling of Cosmetic Products in Istanbul Street Bazaars.Biological trace element research · 2024Article
- Analysis of non-carcinogenic health risk assessment of elemental impurities in vitamin C supplements.Iranian journal of basic medical sciences · 2023Article
- Re-evaluation of the existing health-based guidance values for copper and exposure assessment from all sources.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2023Article
- Multielement determination (essential and potentially toxic elements) in eye shadows exposed to consumption in Brazil using ICP OES.Biometals : an international journal on the role of metal ions in biology, biochemistry, and medicine · 2022Article
- Sustainable changes in beauty market trends focused on the perspective of safety in the post-coronavirus disease-19 period.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2022Review
- Determination of potentially toxic metals in depilatory products in the Iranian markets: human health risk assessment.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the COVID-19 pandemic and wearing masks in many countries, women are keen on elegance, beauty and the use of face foundations. Assessment of health risks associated with the regular use of face foundation by females is dynamic due to the emerging products. The most common international 14 brands of face foundation powders were collected and the concentrations of different elements (Ag, Al, As, B, Ba, Be, Ca, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, Hg, K, Li, Mg, Mn, Mo, Na, P, Pb, Sb, Se, Sn, V and Zn) in each sample were determined. A combined approach merging the conventional and computational tools was used for investigating the risk of exposure to toxic elements. Monte Carlo simulations were applied to calculate risks associated with twenty elements. We attempted different probability distribution functions for concentrations because the actual distribution functions are not known, and the only data available are the mean value and standard deviation of concentrations obtained from experiment. Our results indicate that the total non-carcinogenic health risk through exposure to different elements (Hazardous Index, HI) does not strongly depend on the choice of the probability distribution function for the concentrations. We also show that taking into account probability distributions of other variables and parameters such as body weight, exposed skin area, skin adhesion, etc. does not significantly change the main result rather just slightly broadening the final Hazardous Index distribution function. We found that calculated HI is well below unity for all considered samples, i.e., the dermal exposure to toxic elements in the considered facial powders is negligible and the considered face foundation powders are quite safe to use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.