Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33038271›Full record

ArticleAlcoholism, clinical and experimental research2020

The Feasibility, Tolerability, and Safety of Administering a Very High Alcohol Dose to Drinkers with Alcohol Use Disorder.

Ashley Vena, Meghan Howe, Daniel Fridberg, Dingcai Cao, Andrea C King

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Haven't lost the positive feeling: a dose-response, oral alcohol challenge study in drinkers with alcohol use disorder.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ashley VenaFrom the, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, (AV, MH, DF, ACK), University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.ORCID 0000-0001-9504-3107
Meghan HoweFrom the, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, (AV, MH, DF, ACK), University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Daniel FridbergFrom the, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, (AV, MH, DF, ACK), University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.ORCID 0000-0003-3451-1418
Dingcai CaoDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, (DC), University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Andrea C KingFrom the, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, (AV, MH, DF, ACK), University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.ORCID 0000-0001-5943-7109
University of Chicago · USUniversity of Illinois Chicago · US

Funding

Alcohol Stimulation and Sedation in Binge Drinkers - Renewal 01R01AA013746 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI DANIEL J FRIDBERG, ANDREA C KING · 2003 to 2026
$11.6M
Integrative Training in the Neurobiology of Addictive BehaviorsT32DA043469 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI Donald Hedeker, Xiaoxi Zhuang · 2017 to 2026
$3.8M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA013746NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA043469
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThere remains a paucity of research quantifying alcohol's effects in drinkers with alcohol use disorder (AUD), particularly responses to very high alcohol doses (≥0.8 g/kg). As drinkers with AUD frequently engage in very heavy drinking (8 to 10 drinks/occasion), doses of ≤0.8 g/kg may lack ecological validity. The present study examined the feasibility, tolerability, and safety of administering a very high alcohol dose (1.2 g/kg) to non-treatment-seeking AUD participants.

methodsSixty-one young adult AUD drinkers enrolled in the Chicago Social Drinking Project and completed 3 laboratory sessions at which they consumed a beverage with 1.2, 0.8, and 0.0 g/kg alcohol. Physiological responses (vital signs, nausea and vomiting, breath alcohol concentrations [BrAC]) were monitored throughout the sessions. After each session, participants completed a next-day survey of substance use, engagement in risky behaviors, and related consequences.

resultsOverall, the sample demonstrated good compliance with study procedures; 93% of participants adhered to presession alcohol abstinence requirements (indicated by BrAC < 0.003 g/dl), with no participants exhibiting serious alcohol withdrawal symptoms at arrival to study visits. The 1.2 g/kg alcohol dose achieved an expected mean peak BrAC of 0.13 g/dl at 60 minutes after drinking, which was well tolerated; the majority of the sample did not experience nausea (70%) or vomiting (93%), and dose effects on vital signs were not clinically significant. Finally, we demonstrated that the 1.2 g/kg alcohol dose is safe and not associated with postsession consequences, including reduced sleep time, atypical substance use, accidents or injuries, and severe hangovers.

conclusionResults support the feasibility, tolerability, and safety of administering a very high alcohol dose to young adult drinkers with AUD within the context of a well-validated laboratory alcohol challenge paradigm. Utilizing an alcohol dose more consistent with naturalistic drinking patterns may foster greater ecological validity of laboratory paradigms for persons with moderate to severe AUD.

Indexed as

AdultAlcoholic BeveragesAlcoholismDose-Response Relationship, DrugEthanolFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultEthanolAlcohol Use DisorderHuman Laboratory ResearchOral Alcohol Administration

Identifiers

PMID33038271
PMCPMC7725964
OpenAlexW3092590651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.