ArticleScandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports2021
3D trunk orientation measured using inertial measurement units during anatomical and dynamic sports motions.
Article in Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- A conceptual field-based framework for lower-upper body kinetic chain assessment in the tennis serve using IMUs and portable force plates: measurement coverage, new performance indices, and applied implications.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Review
- Comparisons of the biomechanical characteristics of the swing planes for the driver and 7-iron during the golf swing.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Perceptions and assessment of a novel robotic wheelchair transfer system.The journal of spinal cord medicine · 2025Article
- Assessment of asymmetry and trajectory during repeated twenty-meter sprints in court sports wheelchair athletes.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2025Article
- Trunk angular velocity: A convenient, valid and responsive substitute for force plate-based measures of dynamic postural stability.PloS one · 2025Article
- Intracranial pressure and pulsatility in different head and body positions.Brain communications · 2025Article
- Assessing real-world movements using consumer-grade wearable devices: Measuring segment orientations and movement quality.Wearable technologies · 2025Article
- Article
- Continuous mobile measurement of camptocormia angle using four accelerometers.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2024Article
- PSA-FL-CDM: A Novel Federated Learning-Based Consensus Model for Post-Stroke Assessment.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Validation of Pelvis and Trunk Range of Motion as Assessed Using Inertial Measurement Units.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Validation of Inertial Measurement Units for Analyzing Golf Swing Rotational Biomechanics.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Hang-Time HAR: A Benchmark Dataset for Basketball Activity Recognition Using Wrist-Worn Inertial Sensors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Automatic Post-Stroke Severity Assessment Using Novel Unsupervised Consensus Learning for Wearable and Camera-Based Sensor Datasets.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- How Accurately Can Wearable Sensors Assess Low Back Disorder Risks during Material Handling? Exploring the Fundamental Capabilities and Limitations of Different Sensor Signals.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Ubiquitous Computing in Sports and Physical Activity-Recent Trends and Developments.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Trunk Posture from Randomly Oriented Accelerometers.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Reliability and Validity of an Inertial Measurement System to Quantify Lower Extremity Joint Angle in Functional Movements.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Technical Diagnosis on Elite Female Discus Athletes Based on Grey Relational Analysis.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022Article
- Remote Patient Monitoring with Wearable Sensors Following Knee Arthroplasty.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Trunk motion is related to the performance and risk of injuries during dynamic sports motions. Optical motion capture is traditionally used to measure trunk motion during dynamic sports motions, but these systems are typically constrained to a laboratory environment. Inertial measurement units (IMUs) might provide a suitable alternative for measuring the trunk orientation during dynamic sports motions. The objective of the present study was to assess the accuracy of the three-dimensional trunk orientation measured using IMUs during dynamic sports motions and isolated anatomical trunk motions. The motions were recorded with two IMUs and an optical motion capture system (gold standard). Ten participants performed a total of 71 sports motions (19 golf swings, 15 one-handed ball throws, 19 tennis serves, and 18 baseball swings) and 125 anatomical trunk motions (42, 41, and 42 trials of lateral flexion, axial rotation, and flexion/extension, respectively). The root-mean-square differences between the IMU- and optical motion capture-based trunk angles were less than 5 degrees, and the similarity between the methods was on average across all trials "very good" to "excellent" (R ≥ 0.85; R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.