ArticleGenetic epidemiology2021
JEM: A joint test to estimate the effect of multiple genetic variants on DNA methylation.
Article in Genetic epidemiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Multiple methods have been proposed to aggregate genetic variants in a gene or a region and jointly test their association with a trait of interest. However, these joint tests do not provide estimates of the individual effect of each variant. Moreover, few methods have evaluated the joint association of multiple variants with DNA methylation. We propose a method based on linear mixed models to estimate the joint and individual effect of multiple genetic variants on DNA methylation leveraging genomic annotations. Our approach is flexible, can incorporate covariates and annotation features, and takes into account relatedness and linkage disequilibrium (LD). Our method had correct Type-I error and overall high power for different simulated scenarios where we varied the number and specificity of functional annotations, number of causal and total genetic variants, frequency of genetic variants, LD, and genetic variant effect. Our method outperformed the family Sequence Kernel Association Test and had more stable estimations of effects than a classical single-variant linear mixed-effect model. Applied genome-wide to the Framingham Heart Study data, our method identified 921 DNA methylation sites influenced by at least one rare or low-frequency genetic variant located within 50 kilobases (kb) of the DNA methylation site.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.