Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33038006›Full record

ArticleAdvances in therapy2020

Adherence to the EAU Guideline Recommendations for Local Tumor Treatment in Penile Cancer: Results of the European PROspective Penile Cancer Study Group Survey (E-PROPS).

Maximilian Pallauf, Marie C Hempel, Marie C Hupe, Matthias May, Marlene Haccius, Dorothea Weckermann, Steffen Lebentrau, Bernd Hoschke, Ulrike Necknig, Jesco Pfitzenmaier and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 10 institutions in 2 countries.

Maximilian Pallauf *Department of Urology, University Hospital Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8496-4506
Marie C Hempel *Department of Urology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany. marie@marie-hempel.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9797-9555
Marie C HupeDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Matthias MayDepartment of Urology, St. Elisabeth-Hospital Straubing, Straubing, Germany.
Marlene HacciusDepartment of Urology, St. Elisabeth-Hospital Straubing, Straubing, Germany.
Dorothea WeckermannDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Steffen LebentrauDepartment of Urology, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Ruppiner Kliniken, Neuruppin, Germany.
Bernd HoschkeDepartment of Urology, Carl-Thiem-Clinic Cottbus, Cottbus, Germany.
Ulrike NecknigDepartment of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Garmisch-Partenkirchen Medical Center, Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany.
Jesco PfitzenmaierDepartment of Urology, Evangelical Hospital Bethel, Bielefeld, Germany.
Lukas MankaClinic of Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany.
Philipp NuhnDepartment of Urology, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Peter TörzsökDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Lukas LusuardiDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Axel S MerseburgerDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Paracelsus Medical University · ATUniversity Hospital Schleswig-Holstein · DEBarmherzige Brüder Klinikum St. Elisabeth in Straubing · DECarl-Thiem-Klinikum Cottbus · DEEvangelisches Krankenhaus Bielefeld · DEGarmisch-Partenkirchen Medical Center · DEHeidelberg University · DEKlinikum Braunschweig · DEMedizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane · DEUniversity Hospital Augsburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPenile cancer (PeCa) is an orphan disease in European countries. The current guidelines are predominantly based on retrospective studies with a low level of evidence. In our study, we aimed to identify predictors for guideline-conform treatment and hypothesize that reference centers for PeCa and physicians' experience promote guideline compliance and therefore correct local tumor therapy.

methodsThis study is part of the European PROspective Penile Cancer Study (E-PROPS), an international collaboration group evaluating therapeutic management for PeCa in Central Europe. For this module, a 14-item-survey was developed and sent to 681 urologists in 45 European centers. Three questions focused on therapeutic decisions for PeCa in clinical stage Tis, Ta-T1a, and T1b. Four questions addressed potential personal confounders. Survey results were analyzed by bootstrap-adjusted stepwise multivariate linear regression analysis to identify predictors for EAU guideline-conform local treatment of PeCa.

resultsFor local therapy of cTis 80.4% recommended guideline-conform treatment, for cTa-cT1a 87.3% and for cT1b 59.1%. In total, 42.4% chose a correct approach in all tumor stages. The number of PeCa patients treated at the hospital, a higher level of training of the physicians, resource-based answering and the option of penile-sparing surgery offered at the hospital matched with giving guideline-conform recommendations and thus accurate local tumor treatment.

conclusionPatients with PeCa are best treated by experienced physicians, in centers with a high number of cases, which also offer a wide range of local tumor therapy. This could be offered in reference centers.

Indexed as

EuropeGuideline AdherenceHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingOrgan Sparing TreatmentsPenile NeoplasmsPractice Guidelines as TopicPractice Patterns, Physicians'Prospective StudiesRetrospective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesE-PROPSGuideline adherenceLocal tumor treatmentPenile cancerReference centers

Identifiers

PMID33038006
PMCPMC7595959
OpenAlexW3092482827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.