Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33037973›Full record

ArticleTargeted oncology2020

Efficacy, Prognostic Factors, and Safety Profile of Enzalutamide for Non-metastatic and Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Retrospective Single-Center Analysis in Japan.

Motohiro Fujiwara, Takeshi Yuasa, Yoshinobu Komai, Noboru Numao, Shinya Yamamoto, Iwao Fukui, Junji Yonese

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Targeted oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Motohiro FujiwaraDepartment of Urology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan. motohiro.fujiwara@jfcr.or.jp.ORCID 0000-0001-9454-3345
Takeshi YuasaDepartment of Urology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan.
Yoshinobu KomaiDepartment of Urology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan.
Noboru NumaoDepartment of Urology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan.
Shinya YamamotoDepartment of Urology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan.
Iwao FukuiDepartment of Urology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan.
Junji YoneseDepartment of Urology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan.
Japanese Foundation For Cancer Research · JPThe Cancer Institute Hospital · JP

Funding

Smoking Research Foundation (JP) 16K11035
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEnzalutamide is a novel, non-steroidal anti-androgen that has demonstrated excellent anti-tumor activity for both non-metastatic and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC and mCRPC) patients, and that is being rapidly introduced into clinical practice in Japan.

objectiveWe retrospectively investigated the treatment efficacy, safety profile, and prognostic factors of enzalutamide over a relatively long observation period in Japanese patients with nmCRPC and mCRPC. PATIENTS AND

methodsThe medical records of 184 consecutive Japanese patients with nmCRPC and mCRPC who started enzalutamide treatment in our institution between January 2012 and April 2018 were reviewed. Efficacy and safety profiles were assessed and statistically analyzed.

resultsAmong these 184 patients, 44 (23.9%) nmCRPC patients, 89 (48.4%) docetaxel-naïve mCRPC patients, and 51 docetaxel-pretreated (27.7%) mCRPC patients underwent enzalutamide therapy. The median prostate-specific antigen progression-free survival (PSA-PFS) and overall survival (OS) periods for nmCRPC patients were 39.2 months and not reached; those for docetaxel-naïve mCRPC patients were 16.5 months and 59.8 months; and those for docetaxel-pretreated mCRPC patients were 7.0 months and 30.4 months, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified performance status ≥ 2, PSA > 8.89 ng/mL (median value), hemoglobin < lower limit of normal range, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio > 3.0, and 4-week PSA decline < 50% as the predictive factors for shorter OS. Our respective prognostic models using these factors successfully demonstrated distinctly separated survival curves (p < 0.001). In addition, among these patients, 30 (16.3%) experienced adverse events and 16 (8.7%) experienced adverse events resulting in the discontinuation of therapy. Fatigue (14%) and appetite loss (7%) were the most common such events.

conclusionsBoth the survival period and risk factors were extracted from a relatively long-term observation period. Since enzalutamide was approved for administration to patients with castration-sensitive prostate cancer earlier this year (2020), we believe that the data presented here will be useful for both physicians and patients in clinical practice.

Indexed as

AgedBenzamidesDisease ProgressionHumansJapanMaleNitrilesPhenylthiohydantoinPrognosisProstatic Neoplasms, Castration-ResistantRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeBenzamidesenzalutamideNitrilesPhenylthiohydantoin

Identifiers

PMID33037973
OpenAlexW3092324143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.