Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33037956›Full record

ArticleJapanese journal of radiology2021

Deep learning-based and hybrid-type iterative reconstructions for CT: comparison of capability for quantitative and qualitative image quality improvements and small vessel evaluation at dynamic CE-abdominal CT with ultra-high and standard resolutions.

Ryo Matsukiyo, Yoshiharu Ohno, Takahiro Matsuyama, Hiroyuki Nagata, Hirona Kimata, Yuya Ito, Yukihiro Ogawa, Kazuhiro Murayama, Ryoichi Kato, Hiroshi Toyama

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Japanese journal of radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Current State of Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Applications for Head and Neck MR Imaging.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. [Feasibility Study of Ultra-High-Resolution Low-Dose Temporal Bone CT with 1 024×1 024 Reconstruction Matrix Size].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ryo MatsukiyoDepartment of Radiology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, 1-98, Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan.
Yoshiharu OhnoDepartment of Radiology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, 1-98, Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan. yohno@fujita-hu.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4431-1084
Takahiro MatsuyamaDepartment of Radiology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, 1-98, Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan.
Hiroyuki NagataDepartment of Radiology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, 1-98, Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan.
Hirona KimataCanon Medical Systems Corporation, 1385 Shimoishigami, Otawara-shi, Tochigi, 324-8550, Japan.
Yuya ItoCanon Medical Systems Corporation, 1385 Shimoishigami, Otawara-shi, Tochigi, 324-8550, Japan.
Yukihiro OgawaCanon Medical Systems Corporation, 1385 Shimoishigami, Otawara-shi, Tochigi, 324-8550, Japan.
Kazuhiro MurayamaJoint Research Laboratory of Advanced Medical Imaging, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, 1-98, Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan.
Ryoichi KatoDepartment of Radiology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, 1-98, Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan.
Hiroshi ToyamaDepartment of Radiology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, 1-98, Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan.
Fujita Health University Hospital · JPCanon (Japan) · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine the image quality improvement including vascular structures using deep learning reconstruction (DLR) for ultra-high-resolution CT (UHR-CT) and area-detector CT (ADCT) compared to a commercially available hybrid-iterative reconstruction (IR) method. MATERIALS AND

methodThirty-two patients suspected of renal cell carcinoma underwent dynamic contrast-enhanced (CE) CT using UHR-CT or ADCT systems. CT value and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) on each CT dataset were assessed with region of interest (ROI) measurements. For qualitative assessment of improvement for vascular structure visualization, each artery was assessed using a 5-point scale. To determine the utility of DLR, CT values and CNRs were compared among all UHR-CT data by means of ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc test, and same values on ADCT data were also compared between hybrid IR and DLR methods by paired t test.

resultsFor all arteries except the aorta, the CT value and CNR of the DLR method were significantly higher compared to those of the hybrid-type IR method in both CT systems reconstructed as 512 or 1024 matrixes (p < 0.05).

conclusionDLR has a higher potential to improve the image quality resulting in a more accurate evaluation for vascular structures than hybrid IR for both UHR-CT and ADCT.

Indexed as

Deep LearningQuality ImprovementAbdomenAlgorithmsArteriesCarcinoma, Renal CellFemaleHumansIn Vitro TechniquesKidneyKidney NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedTomography, X-Ray ComputedAbdomenCTDeep learningReconstructionVasculature

Identifiers

PMID33037956
OpenAlexW3091813561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.